kowenicki said:
|
And why would Inside Sim be so relevant?
kowenicki said:
|
And why would Inside Sim be so relevant?
Mordred11 said:
And why would Inside Sim be so relevant? |
Dedicated racing sim site. While since I looked at it. They seemed to keep changing their review approach making it hard to compare titles. Seemed to know their stuff though and give fairly in-depth reviews of sim games for PC and consoles as well as accessories like wheels. TBH their view (and other similar sites) are probably more relevant than a lot of game review sites who I personally wouldn't necessarily trust to know more about how a race car should feel than me or be able to really judge driving physics, etc.
They should review Forza 4 soon - they don't normally bother with deadlines as they're producing in-depth reviews rather than rushing to match game release. I'm hoping a few of the sim sites will review both Forza 4 and revist GT5 after the Spec 2.0 update as that should make for an interesting comparison.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...
does anyone know whats included in single player? so far the reviews havent touched on this mabey apart from cvg
...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...
PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk
really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...
Griffin said:
Oh you mean the reviewers that put in 8-12hours with all assists on then review it... And the ones who have not touched another racing game in over a year and can't remember what they look like or play like. The same reviewers which can't tell the difference between blops PS3 and KZ3 graphics. |
Now your just reaching for excuses. MOST reviewers proabably played the game with assists and without assists to get the whole feel of the game like any reviewer should.
Read this article. The guy put 60hrs into the game and has played GT5. Link
Reasonable said: Dedicated racing sim site. While since I looked at it. They seemed to keep changing their review approach making it hard to compare titles. Seemed to know their stuff though and give fairly in-depth reviews of sim games for PC and consoles as well as accessories like wheels. TBH their view (and other similar sites) are probably more relevant than a lot of game review sites who I personally wouldn't necessarily trust to know more about how a race car should feel than me or be able to really judge driving physics, etc. They should review Forza 4 soon - they don't normally bother with deadlines as they're producing in-depth reviews rather than rushing to match game release. I'm hoping a few of the sim sites will review both Forza 4 and revist GT5 after the Spec 2.0 update as that should make for an interesting comparison. |
In that case,I guess I agree with their review being more relevant than the others.
Like I said,I'm glad F4 turns out to be an amazing game.With the bar set even higher,it can only mean good news for GT fans like myself.
Mordred11 said:
In that case,I guess I agree with their review being more relevant than the others. Like I said,I'm glad F4 turns out to be an amazing game.With the bar set even higher,it can only mean good news for GT fans like myself. |
Forza 4 seems very good from my time with it so far. I actually prefer aspects of GT 5 still, but Forza 4 is close in many respects, ahead in others and still behind in a few (the premium cars in GT5 still slightly nix the Froza 4 models from what I've seen and even reviews putting Forza 4 ahead overall mention this, the lighting still seems a little better on the cars and tracks in Gt 5 and the force feedback and track accuracy also seem better too). But whereas Forza 3 felt like a pretender to the throne for the most part where it mattered Forza 4 really delivers.
So long as Turn 10 stop the silly slagging (which they seem to have done) I think it's great there are two similar titles pushing each other to match each release.
Next up - GT 5 Spec 2.0.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...
Reasonable said: So long as Turn 10 stop the silly slagging (which they seem to have done) I think it's great there are two similar titles pushing each other to match each release. |
Couldn't have said it better myself .
@kowen, it wont let me quote, isnt that the pickup in the background that they demolished a building with it on top and it still started?
...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...
PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk
really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...
Reasonable said:
Forza 4 seems very good from my time with it so far. I actually prefer aspects of GT 5 still, but Forza 4 is close in many respects, ahead in others and still behind in a few (the premium cars in GT5 still slightly nix the Froza 4 models from what I've seen and even reviews putting Forza 4 ahead overall mention this, the lighting still seems a little better on the cars and tracks in Gt 5 and the force feedback and track accuracy also seem better too). But whereas Forza 3 felt like a pretender to the throne for the most part where it mattered Forza 4 really delivers. So long as Turn 10 stop the silly slagging (which they seem to have done) I think it's great there are two similar titles pushing each other to match each release. Next up - GT 5 Spec 2.0. |
reasonable im happy you like it but i need to know what gameplay has been included in single player compared to forza 3?
...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...
PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk
really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...
Griffin said:
Oh you mean the reviewers that put in 8-12hours with all assists on then review it... And the ones who have not touched another racing game in over a year and can't remember what they look like or play like. The same reviewers which can't tell the difference between blops PS3 and KZ3 graphics. |
Those are all assumptions. Even if they were true I would still trust them more than a very biased GT5 lover. You have a motive, they don't.