WOW, using names? Immaturity at it's finest. Fearmongering too.

In 2007 the Health Protection Agency (HPA) announced that the number of newly diagnosed HIV infections amongst gay men had risen for the third successive year, to an all time high.18 In 2010 sex between men accounted for 2,363 new HIV diagnoses, representing 39 per cent of new diagnoses that year.19 By the end of 2009, the number of MSM living with HIV in the UK was estimated at 35,000.20 An estimated four out of five probably acquired their infection in the UK.21 However, around 9,000 MSM living with HIV in the UK are unaware that they are infected.

The level of HIV infection caused by injecting drug use is relatively low in the UK; around 1.8 percent of all new HIV diagnoses in 2010 were attributed to injecting drug use. Just over a third of these infections were definitely acquired within the UK. By the end of December 2010 injecting drug use accounted for 5 percent of HIV diagnoses ever reported in the UK.

http://www.avert.org/aids-uk.htm


So when it comes to AIDS levels among populations it seems that homosexuality has a much larger risk than intravenous drug users.

Heterosexuals make up half the rate but as others have said its mostly immigrants from Africa( why they wouldn't be screened for this is another matter entirely). Plus there are a lot more straight people than gay, so per capita the rate is much higher among gays.

High school?! What subject was it?

The problem is that this ultimately leads to people getting banned for simply being gay, even though there otherwise isn't any reason they would be believed to be HIV positive. A HIV negative gay person who is in a monogamous relationship with another HIV negative person would be banned, while a heterosexual man who has had sex with a different woman every night for the past month would be qualified.

your statements make you sound like a real stupid fucking piece of shit.

I actually never knew the exact name, its something along the line of PE/random cap letters/random cap letters/. I only know PE stands for physical education, never bothered to learn the rest. its basically about health & sports, a big part of the study for that particular term was on safe sex, we even had to learn how to put a condom on a dildo correctly.

...

Over here at PE we just played sports and stuff.

yeah the subject was half sports half study, but sports are just for fun since they don't add to the grade, its really about learning all the health issues, not like that would prevent us becoming the fattiest country in the world ( or did Americans reclaim the throne when I wasn't looking?).

Honestly I think their should be a minimum of a year to two years between having sex with a different male partner and donating blood. With HIV being so high amongst gay couples I think that laxing the laws to much only jeoprodizes public safety.

Also I think similiar laws should be applied to straight men as well. If a guy is sleeping with a different girl every week then the chances of getting infected are huge. That man should not be able to donate blood until he has had at least a year with one girl. Insuring that he doesn't have aids.

I think a major reason for the height of homosexual HIV is the promiscuity. I know a few gay guys and they have sex with different partners constantly. They have orgies and all kinds of shit. But the straight people I know, I don't know any that have sex nearly as much as those gay guys or with as many partners.

My most promiscusios friend (Straight) probably had sex with 2 to 3 different girls a month. At least thats what he bragged constantly who knows could have been less. While one of the gay guys I know talks about having sex with different guys all the time. Even here in this thread a gay guy said he was having sex with a different person every few days. That is just sick, no I don't know any straight guys who have sex with that many women.

However tides are beginning to change. Straight people are beginning to fuck more and more. Fewer marriages more one night stands and screwing multiple girls a year. Hence the rise in straight HIV, however it is still far smaller then homosexual HIV. But can't be ignored.

As such I think if you are outside of a dedicated relationship (Sleeping with someone new within the past year) then you should not be able to give blood. Your blood could be contaminated and infecting some poor innocent person is a horrible thing to do just because you want the equal right to give blood.

I haven't been allowed to donate blood for years due to being on medication. You don't see me getting pissed off, I know that my blood is contaminated and could harm people. As such homosexuals and men who screw multiple girls a year should not be allowed to donate either. Safety first.

This isn't an issue of rights, its an issue of safety. Blood banks are supposed to save lives not end them!

What is your problem? Why so insulting? Do I state I have anything against gays? No, I am perfectly fine with them, as I have stated multiple times.

The argument is not about being homophobic, but that guy turns it into his own personal war against non-existant homophobics. I have told him that multiple times in the conversation. He just ignores that and goes on in his small little "everyone is against me" war.

It is silly and stupid and you know it.

Then you rush in to insult me on calling him out. Way to save the day, big hero.