sapphi_snake on 08 September 2011
iBlah said:
axumblade said:
sapphi_snake said:
phinch1 said:
aha just do as you said before, don't try to reason with him, i agree with this 100%
@Sapphi This is nothing to do with being "homophobic" its to do with low risk infection of the blood and higher risk infection of the blood and Homosexuality leads to a potentioal Higher risk of blood infection...so COMMON sense would be to take more precaution in dealing with higher risk of blood infection
|
Can you please explain to me how 'homosexuality leads to a potential higher risk of blood infection'?
|
It's moreso to do with anal sex than homosexuality if I remember correctly. There's a higher risk of infection/tearing in anal sex. Or that's what I've always heard. That could have just been an excuse I've heard time and time again to "justify" homosexuals being banned from giving blood.
|
It's true. A friend of mine actually did a paper on this for assignment in high school, I still remember the look on our teacher's face 
of course the problem with men is they don't usuallyt have a second option, so...
|
High school?! What subject was it?
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
