My Prime Minister is David Cameron, so no, not really.

He lives his life in absolute terror of the left wing media and British voters, neither of whom are the slightest bit threatening. The moment anybody voices opposition to anything he says, he leaps backwards and cancels all of his plans.

I have no doubt that he is a better Prime Minister than Miliband (socialist moron with no policies) or Clegg (opportunist, again with no real policies other than "do what people like at the moment" would, but there are far better choices within the Conservative party itself.

Speaking of opposition, whenever the Opposition brings up a problem, he sticks his fingers in his ears and says "YEAH BUT LABOUR HAD 13 YEARS TO FIX THAT" and occasionally lists meaningless achievements like reduced red tape and "improved competition".

I get the impression that Cameron is a very intelligent man who knows what this country needs. That becomes clear when you hear him speak to his own party. The trouble is, he seems to think something is wrong with economic liberalism (fiscal conservatism). He refuses to take a strong line against benefit cheats. He speaks of the NHS as this heavenly service that can do no wrong. If he would just realise that the reason he didn't win a majority isn't that traditional Tory policies are unpopular, but because Labour have spend decades trying to convince people of that, and tried to explain why his actions don't amount to fascism, then he would be one of the best Prime Ministers this country has had for a long time.

The ironic thing is, the last leader with balls that we had is the only leader we've had who didn't actually have balls

Just want to express my full support for Anders Breivik's ideology.His actions i don't support but makes you wonder would this left-wing european islamophiles notice his and many others stand on plague of our time-islam.His manifesto is absolute must-read,and should be introduced in western schools all over Europe.You,US are still safe from this plague because you import more christians anually then muslims but I would be very weary.THE SINGLE GOAL of every muslim is to work and do everythink in their power to cretate world caliphate and they will not stop until they do it.Their main weapon is not atomic bomb or something like that;it is their women's womb.So Anders attack on his fellow Norwegians is message to Europe on this muslim invasion they orchestrated.

Regardind my politicians,I am from Bosnia and just to say it is very complicated.We have three ethnic groups,2 religions and two states within the state.One is Muslim-Croat (Catholics) federation and other is Serb (Orthodox) entity.Everybody has their own politicians so country as o whole has very fragile institutions and goverment.If you wanna preserve at least some of your sanity you don't want to get to much into politics here.And if you like percentage it is something obout 50 +% for Bosniaks,30% something for Serbs and around 10% for Croats.We don't really know because we didn't have census since 1991.

This thread contains some of the strangest posts I've ever read on this site.

OT: I'd never vote for Merkel or her party, but at least she's way more bearable than Kohl.

I cannot believe people actually exist who are in any way seriously supporting Anders Breivik.

This sort of thinking needs to be stamped out very quickly, and should really not be tolerated.

And the only reason Kosovo isn't a completely legitimate independent nation by now is because of Russia being obstructionist in the UN (and also Spain and Greece who are worried about the Basque and the Macedonians). Kosovo is de-facto independent, and there is nothing wrong with recognizing the travel visas of an effectively independent polity, just like how most nations will at least recognize the rights of Taiwanese to wander around internationally with legal documents issued from Taipei. China keeps Taiwan out from recognition, Russia bars Kosovo, but Kosovo's already independent, and short of any action that Serbia knows they shouldn't do again (or they'll just have their infrastructure punitively destroyed again), Kosovo's not coming back

Ok. I concede your point that nazism is too complex a movement to categorize it as strictly right wing.

Let's then say Italy's Mussolini or Spain's Franco, or indeed many extreme right wing government that have killed many people.

Regardless, it's not the extreme left that caused the Holocaust. I'm not defending extreme left either, I don't have any sympathy for Stalin, they have done things as terrible or more. But I don't think sapphi's comments are extreme left or that he would in any way support the holocaust. That's a very bold statement to make with no facts.

As I said, any ideology taken to the extreme is dangerous, that's all I'm saying.

What liberal media? The several media outlets worldwide owned by Rupert Murdoch? Also, you should realize that not every view is logical and worth considering.

Yes, your comment makes so much sense. That is, if you ignore the part that I am not extreme left, and the fact that I'm not the one blaming all of society's troubles on a fabricated enemy and saying that something 'needs to be done' regarding that group (typical rhetoric present in the holocaust).

See, this is a perfect example of dangerous right wing rhetoric. It's illogical, paranoid, filled with absurd generalisations (see part in italics). And it's no different than the anti-jew rhetoric present in Nazi Germany.

Liberal media is far more prominent than the likes of Murdoch's empire, it just isn't nearly as demonized.

I don't like the idea of restricting immigration for non-economic means personally, but there is all sorts of scientific study of social harmonization (and otherwise) and its impact on crime, economic growth, happiness etc.  To discount the views of these people is ridiculous, and totally contrary to notions of freedom of speech.

You've clearly not gathered what it is to really be left wing, and that is tolerance.