By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Do you approve your president/prime minister?

 

Do you approve your president/prime minister?

Yes 36 23.08%
 
No 103 66.03%
 
Not sure 14 8.97%
 
Total:153
Eternal said:

Listen,I live with muslims,most of you don't.So,I know them and altough muslims in Bosnia are far more liberal than most muslims in the world,they are still muslims.So,when i say something about them,that is a result of long-time research and commitment to understanding them.

Like,how blind you must be and not realise what's going on in Europe?! It is silent invasion,my brothers.Silent invasion.Your grandchildren or grandgrandchildren will wake up in muslim UK,muslim Germany,Canada and what not.If you think I am over exaggerating,you should bloody wake up and see percentages and see what is most common name in UK these days.

But maybe,you welcome muslim Europe,that is perfectly OK.Just expect sharia in your life and expect to be street cleaners like christians in Egypt.And you would find more similarity to your nowadays life on Mars then in Islam-controlled country.

Now, if we flipped every instance of "Muslim" in your post to "Jew" would it be distinguishable from the rhetoric that led to the deaths of 6 million a few decades back?

@ Xen.

It's pretty straightforward. The Kosovars willed for independence, therefore they should get it, so long as their state guarantees the human rights of its own residents (like i would agree that an independent Kosovo should be bound to respect the rights of the Serbian minority). Those who wish for independence in accordance with established standards of human rights should receive it



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Around the Network
Eternal said:

Listen,I live with muslims,most of you don't.So,I know them and altough muslims in Bosnia are far more liberal than most muslims in the world,they are still muslims.So,when i say something about them,that is a result of long-time research and commitment to understanding them.

Like,how blind you must be and not realise what's going on in Europe?! It is silent invasion,my brothers.Silent invasion.Your grandchildren or grandgrandchildren will wake up in muslim UK,muslim Germany,Canada and what not.If you think I am over exaggerating,you should bloody wake up and see percentages and see what is most common name in UK these days.

But maybe,you welcome muslim Europe,that is perfectly OK.Just expect sharia in your life and expect to be street cleaners like christians in Egypt.And you would find more similarity to your nowadays life on Mars then in Islam-controlled country.

If only the tautology I put in talics were the only thing wrong with this post...



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

^What if it does more bad than good?



Xen said:
^What if it does more bad than good?

Was that at me, or at Sapphi?

The decision for independence is usually not one arrived at haphazardly, and usually the debate about whether independence will do more bad than good is one resolved by the people making the resolution.

States that resolve to have their own independence usually mean that they have a strong sense of national identity, which generally leads to a functional state. So long as their nationalism does not take on radical or racist intentions, independence is preferable to not, so long as the people will it



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Mr Khan said:
Xen said:
^What if it does more bad than good?

Was that at me, or at Sapphi?

The decision for independence is usually not one arrived at haphazardly, and usually the debate about whether independence will do more bad than good is one resolved by the people making the resolution.

States that resolve to have their own independence usually mean that they have a strong sense of national identity, which generally leads to a functional state. So long as their nationalism does not take on radical or racist intentions, independence is preferable to not, so long as the people will it

You (damn I hope Sapphi is not actually typing a reply for me!)

And to be frank, I don't see the good that has came out of this. Yes, the balkans are extremely multicultural and yes they can't always live with eachother, but it seems that this has created more inconveniences and trouble than good. It sounds very nice and ideological on paper, but sadly too much problems always emerge.

South Sudan, however, has the correct idea.



Around the Network
Xen said:
Mr Khan said:
Xen said:
^What if it does more bad than good?

Was that at me, or at Sapphi?

The decision for independence is usually not one arrived at haphazardly, and usually the debate about whether independence will do more bad than good is one resolved by the people making the resolution.

States that resolve to have their own independence usually mean that they have a strong sense of national identity, which generally leads to a functional state. So long as their nationalism does not take on radical or racist intentions, independence is preferable to not, so long as the people will it

You (damn I hope Sapphi is not actually typing a reply for me!)

And to be frank, I don't see the good that has came out of this. Yes, the balkans are extremely multicultural and yes they can't always live with eachother, but it seems that this has created more inconveniences and trouble than good. It sounds very nice and ideological on paper, but sadly too much problems always emerge.

South Sudan, however, has the correct idea.

Nationalism can lead to problems, i know (i seem to recollect that Croatia recently had riots because one of their generals or something was convicted for warcrimes during the Bosnian Civil War, and the people disliked that fact), and free states should be suppressed if they would be a danger (like Chechnya at this point, which by now is so married to radical Islam that a free Chechnya would just be the next Taliban Afghanistan), but generally you trend towards less social strife, even if it may not be for the best of reasons in some cases (like how a lot of Serbs probably moved out of the outlying republics as Yugoslavia disintegrated)

Self-determination is the prime right of all peoples, but that should be taken responsibly and only when the people to be freed would adhere to standards of human rights that we can all respect



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Mr Khan said:
Xen said:
Mr Khan said:
Xen said:
^What if it does more bad than good?

Was that at me, or at Sapphi?

The decision for independence is usually not one arrived at haphazardly, and usually the debate about whether independence will do more bad than good is one resolved by the people making the resolution.

States that resolve to have their own independence usually mean that they have a strong sense of national identity, which generally leads to a functional state. So long as their nationalism does not take on radical or racist intentions, independence is preferable to not, so long as the people will it

You (damn I hope Sapphi is not actually typing a reply for me!)

And to be frank, I don't see the good that has came out of this. Yes, the balkans are extremely multicultural and yes they can't always live with eachother, but it seems that this has created more inconveniences and trouble than good. It sounds very nice and ideological on paper, but sadly too much problems always emerge.

South Sudan, however, has the correct idea.

Nationalism can lead to problems, i know (i seem to recollect that Croatia recently had riots because one of their generals or something was convicted for warcrimes during the Bosnian Civil War, and the people disliked that fact), and free states should be suppressed if they would be a danger (like Chechnya at this point, which by now is so married to radical Islam that a free Chechnya would just be the next Taliban Afghanistan), but generally you trend towards less social strife, even if it may not be for the best of reasons in some cases (like how a lot of Serbs probably moved out of the outlying republics as Yugoslavia disintegrated)

Self-determination is the prime right of all peoples, but that should be taken responsibly and only when the people to be freed would adhere to standards of human rights that we can all respect

We mirror the general idea, then.

Though we seem to see Kosovo quite differently. But since I'm so drained from today, I just can't think I can discuss that.



I answered "I'm not sure". Indeed, as a belgian, I have no actual government for more than a year... that's some shitty world record



This is our chancellor:

Do I need to say more?



updated: 14.01.2012

playing right now: Xenoblade Chronicles

Hype-o-meter, from least to most hyped:  the Last Story, Twisted Metal, Mass Effect 3, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Playstation ViTA

bet with Mordred11 that Rage will look better on Xbox 360.

yog-sothot said:
I answered "I'm not sure". Indeed, as a belgian, I have no actual government for more than a year... that's some shitty world record

Somalia, 20 years running.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.