By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - The Sissy Boy Experiment and Why You Can't "Cure" the Gay

elticker said:
sapphi_snake said:
elticker said:

its not sarcastic.

I wrote above why the experiment failed however to say its a total failure is just denail as it stopped him from having gay relationships and changed him however the problem was in the trauma it was too much and he lied in the experiment and there was manipulating in the experiment which cause ineffiecency. also look at all my points which state how to improve it. I however for one am against physical pain as i believe it isn't as good as emotional me my self being hit by my father when i was young let me hate him however when i grew up i understand to an extent why he did it, however he gets angry at pretty much anything which makes it very hard to live with him since he just places the blame for his mistakes on other people. all i said is no sarcastic and is a simple analysis of how to improve the technique for it to be effective.

He did have gay relationships. The experiment didn't change him. Did you even read the article? All it did was make him hate himself for the rest of his life until he couldn't take it anymore. There was never anythign "wrong" with him, so there was never anything that needed "fixing". The whole experiment, from start to finish, was a process of psychological (and later physiological) torture that could only cause long-lasting damage. There's nothing to "improve" regardign this experiment (and it isn't the first of it's kind, as several such experiments have failed, this isn't the first one).

Also, you are a terrible human being. Just thought you should know.

spare me the all do no wrong attitude, I analyzed it from a scientific prespective, i watched the vids and read teh paragraphs the op posted. can you lead me to the gay relationships he had (post the paragraph which had it)?

secondly you are accusing me of being a teribly human being without even knowing my opinoin which invalidates the statement, my analysis was purely scientific.

My opinoin is that being gay is wrong as it is against what you are supposed to do in life which is advance the human race and have children for survival and i couldn't give a fuck if a person is gay or not (unless if he tries to start a relationship with me which would get him to the hospital asap) as him being gay creates less competition for women which i welcome. I am against treating gay people with this way just let them be, also i am a very strongly against changing gender without having a trans (female-male) as it would suck if i know that i slept with a female which was actually a male.

summary: i don't give a fuck about a person being gay or not, and i say that let gay people be.


The last thing the human race needs right now is more of us, we're already overpopulated. In this context, it's more "wrong" to be straight than gay.





Around the Network
sapphi_snake said:
Porcupine_I said:
sapphi_snake said:
Porcupine_I said:
This whole experiment is wrong on so many levels and i feel kind of ashamed that i find it very interesting.

What's interesting about it? I find it disgusting to use human beings as lab rats for the inhuman experiments based off of false premises perpetuated by conservative cultural myths.

of course it is disgusting! Nobody should ever have to endure something like that.

when i say i find it interesting does not mean i actually like what i read. i just don't have a better word to describe it.

let me put it this way: i hate the fact that someone had to suffer so i can gain the knowledge of how wrong they were with their ideas.

Well, it's pretty obvious why adversion therapy would fail. If I show you a piece of paper that's green, and I ask you "Porcupine, this piece of paper's black, no?", and you say "No, it's green" I will then slap you. We'll continue this, and eventually I'll start hitting you harder, possibly hiting you with objects. Eventually you'll learn that if you see the green paper, and say it's green I hit you, and if you say it's black I don't, so when I'll ask you if it's black, you'll answer "yes". However, that won't change the fact that you see a green piece of paper, no?

actually i kinda feel in that situation right now. are you continue slapping me with replies now until i admit i was wrong?

i already said i do not condone any of this. i still find it interesting. do i need to be healed now?



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Porcupine_I said:

actually i kinda feel in that situation right now. are you continue slapping me with replies now until i admit i was wrong?

i already said i do not condone any of this. i still find it interesting. do i need to be healed now?

Ok, ok. I know you know you were wrong. Just make sure your scientific curiosity never gets the better of your moral values.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

sapphi_snake said:

@Joelcool7:

I love how people are commenting about this guy and how he was meant to be gay based on how he acted as a child. I have to say the premise of this experiment was absurd.

The premise was absurd, but it was the popular belief back then, and you can blame society's heterosexism for it. Trying to "change" him was wrong, and I'm not referring to the homosexual part. So what if he liked playing with dolls and other girly things? There's nothing wrong with that! The ideea that boys should act a certain way and gilrs should act a certain way is nothing but a cultural myth. I played with dolls when I was little too, and there was nothing no one could do to stop me.

Now my audio on my computer is not working so I can't view the videos. But from the sound of it the doctor was trying to cure homosexuality by preventing what he thought to be a major cause. However I bet that this kid may never have been gay at all. Infact telling him from a young age that he was going gay, probably had a profound psychological effect on the child.

He was never told that he was gay. He was only told things like "act this way, not that way", and when he'd act the way he was told not to he'd be punished. The result is that he grew up with a strong sense that he's "different", and that society wants doesn't like the way he is and that he should "change" (something that's impossible, as you can be no one else but yourself). It's quite hurtful to go your whole life thinking that everyone considers the way you are to be "wrong", "defective", and that they'll actually go as far as abusing you to try to change you.

I know a gay person who grew up with a mom who told him from very young that she never wanted a boy she wanted a girl. She dressed him in skirts and raised him as a girl, years later he came out of the closet and she was so happy. Fact is do i think he was born gay? No I don't but having that psychological pressure to be gay would definatly alter your viewpoint of yourself.

Psychological pressure to be gay? This seems like another one of your impossible-to-believe stories. Also, the guy from the experiment definately felt no pressure to be gay, but quite the opposite. The experiment was about crushing human diversity and trying to uniformize people.

Now I find it funny that the doctor was found to be gay. What does that really matter? Wouldn't that have made him an expert on homosexuality as he claimed to be? I don't know why that was even used in the article, its not really useful information. So the expert on homosexuality was infact gay. So what?

It shows that if his "treatment" would've worked, he wouldn't be gay himself.

The doctor's treatment could have actually driven this child to believe he was gay whether he was biologically or not.

No, the experiment could've not done this.

Look at what scientists and doctors are willing to do to prove their thesis. To prove their theories, scientists will do all kinds of horrible things to advance the name of science. To argue this man wasn't a scientist is sort of laughable. He just had methodology which is unnacceptable to modern society. But for the 70's he didn't really do much that wasn't being done by other scientists.

Back then doctors were considered "gods in white coats". However, this particular case isn't as much science's fault as it is the fault of religion and conservatism. The guy was funded and supported by conservative christian organisations, such as the Family Research Council, and he went on to be a proeminent memeber the ex-gay organisation NARTH. This is an example of what happens when religion interferes with science. I'm actually pretty sure the leading "scientists" who participated in this experiment were all Christians.

This experiment would never have taken place, had there not been no pressure from Christians and conservatives to "fix" gays, as they were and are the people who claim that homosexuality is wrong, and that gays need "fixing".

Look at Autism for example. Doctors tried electrocuting patients , frying their brains. They tried solutary confinement and lobotamy. Fact is those were also doctors and scientists.

So this one guy doing this to a gay kid, really Sapphi what about all the scientists and doctors who did the same horrible things or even worse to other mental patients. I find it funny that in all these years I have never seen a thread about how these kinds of treatments were used to deal with other mental patients. But when its done to a gay kid suddenly its a huge topic and everyone cares.

I found this article, and I decided to post it. Had I found a similar article about the treatment of mental patients, I would've posted that too.

The big difference is that experiments like this are still practiced today on gays. If you read about the experiences of people who survived ex-gay therapy, you'll find out that organisations who try to help gays "change" actualyl still use elctroshock treatment, and other abusive methods. While all this should be illegal because (a) there is nothing wrong with homosexuality, (b) you can not change someone'e sexual orientation, and these treatments are essentially torture (however due to pressure from conservative christian organisations, these treatments are not banned, and the organisations practicign them are not closed down).I also found a blog of a christian minister who "helped" people who were gay "change", and he was gloating how he was torturing his latest "patient", and how he was keeping him restrained against his will (the kid wanted to live, but the minister was keeping him locked in a room, and wasn't letting him out or have any contact with the outside world).


I find it funny when ever one of my stories conflicts with your beliefs you automatically call their legitamacy into question. Their are many psychological things that can change a man's outlook on life, psychology could easily change someones sexual orientation. Also I couldn't hear the audio so I never watched the videos. But being phsyically punished every time you do something, would effect you psychologically. You would either rebel and do exactly what you were not supposed to do, or youd break and conform to what was being forced on you.

In this case he could have easily decided screw society screw my parents, that doctor I will do what ever they don't want me too. This could lead him to a more homosexual lifestyle. Now you say that psychology does not effect sexual orientation. Now tell me do you consider Metrosexuality a sexual orientation? Do you consider it biological? Being Metro what made me this way was the lack of male influences. My dad was never around by court order, my other sibling was a younger sister. The majority of my friends were girls. This effected how I grew up and made me Metro. Now I fought the idea I was Metro for a very long time, untill it turned out everyone thought I was gay and those that didn't thought I was Metro. Infact I don't know a single friend who doesn't think I'm Metro. So now I admit it. But fact is psychology effects sexual orientation in cases, maybe not all cases but psychology plays a very big role in everything a human does.

Doctors and scientists these days are still considered God's in white coats. Every doctor thinks they know everything and they will go to great lengths to prove they do. Scientists today still do all kinds of things to prove their points and theories. Whether it is experimenting on humans or animals.

Again blaming the Christians and Conservatives for this experiment and all lifes problems. Your forgetting the horrible experiments and things done to human patients by athiest doctors, and other religious doctors. Instead of saying "This experiment was bad" you feel compelled to say "This experiment is bad and its all because of Christians". I don't know why you always have to blame everything on Christians. Would you have honestly posted a story about a mental patients brutal treatment at the hands of an athiest doctor? No you wouldn't. Fact is this isn't a Christian issue, scientists and doctors across the world have done these same horrible things in the name of science for hundreds to thousands of years. But you wouldn't write about those cases because they don't agree with your agenda.

Now about the horrific fact that these practices are still carried out on gays. I myself was brought to a homeopathic nurse to cure my autism. I was strapped to a bed and had these weird strobes put over my head. Now it was nothing like the movies I barely felt the shocks but it was very interesting to see such a practice still being carried out (Last year) on people with mental dissabilities. Up until the late 60's their were cases of lobotomies being carried out here in Canada. Infact today lobotomies are still being performed on epileptic patients and other people with mental dissabilities. Now these are being carried out by doctors today against people with mental dissabilities. These aren't Conservative Christian's pushing a hidden agenda.

Now is having your brain scrambled any worse then what this doctor did in the name of science to cure this man of homosexuality? The horrible things you mention that the Christian Pastor was doing to cure a young boy of homosexuality. Step inside a psych ward. Patients are tied to beds, but in pitch black rooms with soft walls. They are drugged beyond belief they are subjected often to abuse by workers. They are confined like prisoners. I have known people who went into psych wards for schizophrenia and he spent a whole week in a room with no light just sitting by himself.

Now today homeopaths and many doctors use many methods to cure mental illnesses. Many far worse then what this doctor subjected that child too. Do I think the doctor did something wrong, yes. However I think you using the story just to vent how pissed you are at conservatives and Christians, thats pretty wrong in itself.

I am highly offended that you ignore all the stories these days of people being treated just as bad if not worse by the medical field. Also what about all the other suicides? What about the 3,616 suicides each year in the US. Why is this single case so important? Thats just the US consider how many suicides their are each year accross the earth?

Almost everyone commiting suicide has been driven to that point. What about the bullying of people of all beliefs carried out by no not just Christians but everyone else. The pink shirt rally in Canada is a perfect example this one kid got bullied all the time because he had a pink shirt. So finally some of the highschool students noticed and wore pink shirts as well and it soon became a big deal to wear a pink shirt.

Many victims of suicide have been tormented their whole lives. Christians aren't the only ones out their bullying. Infact even Athiests bully and agnostics and people of all beliefs. But you will only care about the few cases caused by Christian's. Its like the Bible said about the man who points out the splinter of wood in his neighbours eye while ignoring the log in his own.

Fact is yah some Christian's screw up, but their are thousands of cases of suicide and other autrocities caused by non-Christians across the world.

So to summorize your and I's debate

- People still do horrible things to try and fix people. Lobotomies, electroshock therapy forced confinement tie people down. all of these methods are still legal and carried out by both Christians and non-Christians

-a handful of gay guys commit suicide each year, the news and gay movement go nutz while the other 3,000+ suicide victims get ignored by the general public. If your not gay your suicide doesn't matter to most people

I could go on but am tired so I'm out. But this is why I get so peived. People don't seem to care about the lobotomies or the electroshock therapy dished out to Autistic patients and other mental patients, but when a gay guy gets it to treat his homosexuality suddenly its a big deal. 3,000 people die each year of suicide but the second a gay guy kills himself it makes the news, this has to be like the sixth or so case I've heard reported in the last year.

Homosexuals are people like everyone else, they deserve no less or no more attention then is given to everyone else. A suicide victim is a suicide victim. A doctor who is Christian and carries out electroshock therapy is evil but a doctor scrambling a patients brains because he is alittle different isn't reported or seen as unbrutal.

In the end I think all these barbaric methods should become illegal, whether your a Christian doctor or not. No special treatment in the media should be given to any single individual. We should all be treated with equal dignity and respect!



-JC7

"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer

 

sapphi_snake said:
HappySqurriel said:
Just an obvious point ... Failing to do something with one approach does not imply that it can not be done. I'm not saying that you can (or should) "cure" someone's homosexuality, but this approach would probably screw someone up regardless of what you were trying to "cure".

While not exactly the same thing, if you took this approach with someone who stuttered you would probably end up with someone who had a lot of guilt and self hatred; and if they continued to stutter into their adult years it could lead them to commit suicide.

What this experiment proves is that homosexuality is not caused by envirnomental factors, but rather it's an inborn trait (there have been several similar experiments, all of which have failed, and the the poor victims shared the same fait - suicide).

You really need to study formal logic and scientific proof because you really don't have a clue what you're talking about.



Around the Network
sapphi_snake said:
Porcupine_I said:

actually i kinda feel in that situation right now. are you continue slapping me with replies now until i admit i was wrong?

i already said i do not condone any of this. i still find it interesting. do i need to be healed now?

Ok, ok. I know you know you were wrong. Just make sure your scientific curiosity never gets the better of your moral values.

i was wrong? in what way? is it wrong to feel guilty for finding something of interest? i really don't get what you are aiming at.



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

elticker said:
sapphi_snake said:
elticker said:

its not sarcastic.

I wrote above why the experiment failed however to say its a total failure is just denail as it stopped him from having gay relationships and changed him however the problem was in the trauma it was too much and he lied in the experiment and there was manipulating in the experiment which cause ineffiecency. also look at all my points which state how to improve it. I however for one am against physical pain as i believe it isn't as good as emotional me my self being hit by my father when i was young let me hate him however when i grew up i understand to an extent why he did it, however he gets angry at pretty much anything which makes it very hard to live with him since he just places the blame for his mistakes on other people. all i said is no sarcastic and is a simple analysis of how to improve the technique for it to be effective.

He did have gay relationships. The experiment didn't change him. Did you even read the article? All it did was make him hate himself for the rest of his life until he couldn't take it anymore. There was never anythign "wrong" with him, so there was never anything that needed "fixing". The whole experiment, from start to finish, was a process of psychological (and later physiological) torture that could only cause long-lasting damage. There's nothing to "improve" regardign this experiment (and it isn't the first of it's kind, as several such experiments have failed, this isn't the first one).

Also, you are a terrible human being. Just thought you should know.

spare me the all do no wrong attitude, I analyzed it from a scientific prespective, i watched the vids and read teh paragraphs the op posted. can you lead me to the gay relationships he had (post the paragraph which had it)?

secondly you are accusing me of being a teribly human being without even knowing my opinoin which invalidates the statement, my analysis was purely scientific.

My opinoin is that being gay is wrong as it is against what you are supposed to do in life which is advance the human race and have children for survival and i couldn't give a fuck if a person is gay or not (unless if he tries to start a relationship with me which would get him to the hospital asap) as him being gay creates less competition for women which i welcome. I am against treating gay people with this way just let them be, also i am a very strongly against changing gender without having a trans (female-male) as it would suck if i know that i slept with a female which was actually a male.

summary: i don't give a fuck about a person being gay or not, and i say that let gay people be.



Nice dude, really nice. You don't sound like a homophobe at all.



@Joelcool7:

I find it funny when ever one of my stories conflicts with your beliefs you automatically call their legitamacy into question.

Your stories are questionable for several reasons. Your past stories were disproven by people who live in the same country as you do (the school where everybody was gay, and straight people were bullied story). This in turn leads me to look at all your stories with skepticism, especially when they seem outrageous. You seem to know of lots of cases like this, yet no one else has such experiences. It's as if you read the, from some church pamflet warning against the dangers of homosexuality.

Their are many psychological things that can change a man's outlook on life, psychology could easily change someones sexual orientation.

Outside of the ex-gay movement, I doubt any respectable psychologist would make such a claim.

But being phsyically punished every time you do something, would effect you psychologically. You would either rebel and do exactly what you were not supposed to do, or youd break and conform to what was being forced on you. In this case he could have easily decided screw society screw my parents, that doctor I will do what ever they don't want me too. This could lead him to a more homosexual lifestyle.

Except sexual orientation isn't a lifestyle. It simply means being attracted to someone of a particular gender. He did not start having sex with men to rebell against anyone, he had sex with men because h found men attractive. The rationale behind this experiment was that effeminate boys grow up to be gay, so making them butch up will make them turn out straight. The "treatment" consisted of making him act like a "normal" little boy (as in a boy who played with action figures, was aggressive etc.), the ideea being that if he didn't act effeminate he wouldn't end up being gay. That obviously proved to not be true, not because of some rebellion, but because the two aren't connected, and homosexuality is about internal desires and feelings which cannot be modified by externam factors. If he had rebelled, he would've become extremely effeminate, and would've opened up a hair salon or something. Instead he joined the army, so he was obviously doing the opposite of rebelling.

Now tell me do you consider Metrosexuality a sexual orientation? Do you consider it biological?

No, metrosexuality is not a sexual orientation. A metrosexual is defined as a man who spends a lot of time and money on shopping, in order to take care of his physical appearence. It has nothing to do with sexuality (though FTR, metrosexuals are generally heterosexual men, not gay men). So your example doesn't prove anything.

Doctors and scientists these days are still considered God's in white coats. Every doctor thinks they know everything and they will go to great lengths to prove they do. Scientists today still do all kinds of things to prove their points and theories. Whether it is experimenting on humans or animals.

Due to things like the Internet, doctor's are no longer assumed to have infinite and absolute knowledge, now that people themselves can have easy access to medical information (plus, all the scandals that took place in the aftermath of the "gods in white coats" period has made people stop trusting doctors).

Again blaming the Christians and Conservatives for this experiment and all lifes problems.

I'm blaming them for THIS experiment, and it's quite justified because:

- They're the ones who funded it;

- The doctors that performed this experiment were affiliated with christian organisations;

- They created the "need" for such an experiment in the first place.

Your forgetting the horrible experiments and things done to human patients by athiest doctors, and other religious doctors.

It's irrelevant to this issue.

Would you have honestly posted a story about a mental patients brutal treatment at the hands of an athiest doctor? No you wouldn't. Fact is this isn't a Christian issue, scientists and doctors across the world have done these same horrible things in the name of science for hundreds to thousands of years. But you wouldn't write about those cases because they don't agree with your agenda.

THIS is a christian issue! Regarding atheist doctors, during the Holocaust, nazi doctors would performed horrible genetic experiments on gays. I'm quite sure some of them were atheists. There's no group identity within atheists, and I quite frankly don't see the actions of other atheists having anything to do with me. There's also no such thing as an "atheist ideology", so if an atheist is homophobic, that has nothing to do with his/her atheism.

Up until the late 60's their were cases of lobotomies being carried out here in Canada. Infact today lobotomies are still being performed on epileptic patients and other people with mental dissabilities. Now these are being carried out by doctors today against people with mental dissabilities. These aren't Conservative Christian's pushing a hidden agenda.

Epilespy is not a mental disorder, it's a neurological disorder.

Now is having your brain scrambled any worse then what this doctor did in the name of science to cure this man of homosexuality? The horrible things you mention that the Christian Pastor was doing to cure a young boy of homosexuality. Step inside a psych ward. Patients are tied to beds, but in pitch black rooms with soft walls. They are drugged beyond belief they are subjected often to abuse by workers. They are confined like prisoners. I have known people who went into psych wards for schizophrenia and he spent a whole week in a room with no light just sitting by himself.

It's nor any worse, but it in no way lessens the treatment that this guy was subjected to, which for a fact is the subject of this whole thread.

I am highly offended that you ignore all the stories these days of people being treated just as bad if not worse by the medical field.

Why? What obligation do I have to keep track of EVERY case of abuse in the medical field? I randomly found this and decided to post it. Instead of criticising me, how about you make your own thread and post about a case of medical abuse you've heard of.

Also what about all the other suicides? What about the 3,616 suicides each year in the US. Why is this single case so important? Thats just the US consider how many suicides their are each year accross the earth?

You're just trying to make this case seem less important. It's not just the suicide, but the envets that led up to it (most importantly the experiment).

Many victims of suicide have been tormented their whole lives. Christians aren't the only ones out their bullying. Infact even Athiests bully and agnostics and people of all beliefs. But you will only care about the few cases caused by Christian's. Its like the Bible said about the man who points out the splinter of wood in his neighbours eye while ignoring the log in his own.

I don't believe I've ever made anyone commit suicide. You've also just admitted that christians are to blame for this suicide. The bottom line is that most people who commit suicide rarely do so because of abuse they recieve from society as a whole.

-a handful of gay guys commit suicide each year, the news and gay movement go nutz while the other 3,000+ suicide victims get ignored by the general public. If your not gay your suicide doesn't matter to most people

Suicide rates are higher amongst gays then amongst the general population.

I could go on but am tired so I'm out. But this is why I get so peived. People don't seem to care about the lobotomies or the electroshock therapy dished out to Autistic patients and other mental patients, but when a gay guy gets it to treat his homosexuality suddenly its a big deal. 3,000 people die each year of suicide but the second a gay guy kills himself it makes the news, this has to be like the sixth or so case I've heard reported in the last year.

One of the reasons why it's a big deal is that homosexuality is not a "disease", nor is it somethign that needs to be "cured". Those other things you mentioned really are disorders/diseases.

 



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Porcupine_I said:
sapphi_snake said:
Porcupine_I said:

actually i kinda feel in that situation right now. are you continue slapping me with replies now until i admit i was wrong?

i already said i do not condone any of this. i still find it interesting. do i need to be healed now?

Ok, ok. I know you know you were wrong. Just make sure your scientific curiosity never gets the better of your moral values.

i was wrong? in what way? is it wrong to feel guilty for finding something of interest? i really don't get what you are aiming at.

Are you happy that the experiment took place, and you could get all this info, or would you have rather the experiment never taken place, and this guy (and the other people who were put through this) never experienced such abuse?



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

waw everyone is just qouting part of what i say from my first post and don't want to read the next qoute for clarification.
no i don't have an anti-gay stance, i used to however my friend put it to me in another prespective some time ago which made me reconsider and i no longer have problems with having gay people in our society.