By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - TheGUNNShop says "Nintendo Wii 2 is a joke!"

 

TheGUNNShop says "Nintendo Wii 2 is a joke!"

Yes, he is right 64 25.91%
 
No, this guy's a joke 115 46.56%
 
I'm not sure 35 14.17%
 
See poll 33 13.36%
 
Total:247
LordTheNightKnight said:
Runa216 said:

Does anyone remember the good old days when GAMEPLAY ruled games?  remember when people cared more about controls and level design and challenge and innovation rather than focussing on processing speed and framerate and bump mapping and shading?  Graphics are just the presentation, and yet so many developers (and an even higher percentage of gamers) care more about that than the core of the game.  It kinda sickens me becuase I'm finding more and more games are entirely unrefined when it comes to the basics, even when they look gorgeous.  

This discussion is a testament to this paradigm shift in gaming:  The entire thread has been dedicated to laughing at Nintendo's attempt to 'keep up' with modern gaming becuause, apparently, a console can't be taken seriously if it doesn't support HD.  As I mentioned before, This is simply not the case, and the Wii proves that most people don't give a shit about graphics, only the 'core' gamers do, even though they're the people who should know better.  

Also, I'm curious, how do I make my own thread on here?  I keep trying but cant find a 'make new thread' button anywhere. 


I've been on that for a while.

Also, go to a main subject page, and right  above the thread list will be the "New Thread" button.

Don't think it'll show up, iirc there's still a 100 post minimum for making your own threads.



...

Around the Network
Torillian said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Runa216 said:

Does anyone remember the good old days when GAMEPLAY ruled games?  remember when people cared more about controls and level design and challenge and innovation rather than focussing on processing speed and framerate and bump mapping and shading?  Graphics are just the presentation, and yet so many developers (and an even higher percentage of gamers) care more about that than the core of the game.  It kinda sickens me becuase I'm finding more and more games are entirely unrefined when it comes to the basics, even when they look gorgeous.  

This discussion is a testament to this paradigm shift in gaming:  The entire thread has been dedicated to laughing at Nintendo's attempt to 'keep up' with modern gaming becuause, apparently, a console can't be taken seriously if it doesn't support HD.  As I mentioned before, This is simply not the case, and the Wii proves that most people don't give a shit about graphics, only the 'core' gamers do, even though they're the people who should know better.  

Also, I'm curious, how do I make my own thread on here?  I keep trying but cant find a 'make new thread' button anywhere. 


I've been on that for a while.

Also, go to a main subject page, and right  above the thread list will be the "New Thread" button.

Don't think it'll show up, iirc there's still a 100 post minimum for making your own threads.


I wasn't aware of that. So Runa needs to contribute more (but no post spamming of course).



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

i understand his reasoning completely and I AGREE!



archbrix said:

What irks me about this guy is that he basically contradicts himself; he says that the graphical capabilities need to be on par with current PCs to interest him, yet before that he says that even if the system is "way more powerful"than PS360, it's still not enough... guess he means it must be way, way more powerful?

Also the whole attitude that "even if one was donated to me, I wouldn't even open it out of the box"... seriously?!


if current consoles were on par with current PCs they would be capable of pushing way, way higher graphics, physics, effects, etc.

Especially if he is talking about Intel's beast skulltrail. Dual Core i7 995s plus two GTX590s... omfg you have power beyond power. I think it could nearly emulate the xbox 360 on it....



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
Carl2291 said:

Most well known gamer on Youtube?

He's a fan of the New England Patriots?

That's all I had to know...



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

Around the Network
LordTheNightKnight said:
Torillian said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Runa216 said:

Does anyone remember the good old days when GAMEPLAY ruled games?  remember when people cared more about controls and level design and challenge and innovation rather than focussing on processing speed and framerate and bump mapping and shading?  Graphics are just the presentation, and yet so many developers (and an even higher percentage of gamers) care more about that than the core of the game.  It kinda sickens me becuase I'm finding more and more games are entirely unrefined when it comes to the basics, even when they look gorgeous.  

This discussion is a testament to this paradigm shift in gaming:  The entire thread has been dedicated to laughing at Nintendo's attempt to 'keep up' with modern gaming becuause, apparently, a console can't be taken seriously if it doesn't support HD.  As I mentioned before, This is simply not the case, and the Wii proves that most people don't give a shit about graphics, only the 'core' gamers do, even though they're the people who should know better.  

Also, I'm curious, how do I make my own thread on here?  I keep trying but cant find a 'make new thread' button anywhere. 


I've been on that for a while.

Also, go to a main subject page, and right  above the thread list will be the "New Thread" button.

Don't think it'll show up, iirc there's still a 100 post minimum for making your own threads.


I wasn't aware of that. So Runa needs to contribute more (but no post spamming of course).

I've actually got a post count over 100, and I still can't find it.  Ah well, it'll come eventually.  I was planning on a few various threads over time, some of them controversial (I have a lot of quirky opinions on gaming, gaming culture, systems, and the way they've changed over time.  

Edit:  Okay I'm an idiot, I only have 40 posts, the 103 number is something else.  I guess I get to keep at it, then! 



My Console Library:

PS5, Switch, XSX

PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360

3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android

Carl2291 said:

Most well known gamer on Youtube?


Aaaight PEOPLE!!  What the F@%k!!  ElPresador is a beast of bliblical proportion..  because thats what he does!!! 



My Trigger Happy Sixaxis controller

 


                            

ssj12 said:
Dr.Grass said:
ssj12 said:
Dr.Grass said:
ssj12 said:
LordTheNightKnight said:

"THQ stated that a big budget next gen game would cost around 100$ at retail they said it would cost almost double to develop over the current generation."

This is why the graphics race has to stop. They aren't making the games better (the good games are due to talent, not waving their specs around), and the sales have NOT risen this generation to match the increased cost over last generation.


Graphics should not affect development ability or cost. Its the hardware itself. The 360 uses simple tech compared to the PS3, which is why PS3 games still cost more to develop for and its cheaper to make the PS3 game the main platform and port over to the 360 versus the otherway around. Creation of higher quality textures and graphics might take a fraction longer, but the cost of making textures in Photoshop is the exact same no matter if your making an SNES game or a PlayStation 9 game.


LOL WUT. Do you know anything about programming and developing at all!?

do you? I've been a web developer since I was 7, and game development is very similar to web development in many ways. In both fields you; need to know what your making for the client; know how to program it; know how to create visuals; know how to put it all together; test functionality and compatibility with platforms; fix bugs and retest; release product; fix bugs that arise post-release.

Programming is done by code called C , OpenGL, and several others.

Graphics in general are skin textures, wall textures, 3D objects, and random other things that have been developed for years and created using Photoshop, Maya, and several others. Yes increase in power allows for better looking graphics because you can create larger objects with more depth to internal structure. A Xbox/PC game back in the day should have been harder to create than now due to less functional tools to create certain textures, but with Photoshop CS5, newer 3D modeliong tools, and such it should be a lot easier since there are more advanced tools that allow for better looking things in the same amount of time. 

Now things like fire, smoke, ragdoll animation, lighting, and other things come under programming, more specifically physics programming which takes animation or textures created by the graphics team and coded to work in a game. While code has advanced to be more complex, once learned at the beginning of a generation it becomes easier and less time consuming.

The one thing that majorly affects costs overall is understanding. If you have a programming team that are still learning a platform costs will rise as they discover how to actually make things function.

Yes I do know something about programming.

You are right in saying that costs come down as a developer familiarizes itself with new hardware. Sure. But you saying this is just a self-defeating argument isn't it? You see, you implicitly state therein that new hardware raises programming costs.

Oh, and being a web developer is nothing like being an actual programmer. Sorry for bursting your bubble. The proof of that is that no-one can start programming, C,C , C sharp, Java etc. when they are 7 y/o. 


HTML,  CSS, JavaScript, Visual Basic, XML, PHP variations, MySQL databases, etc. I surely do not deal with software languages at all. >.>


Regardless of that

''Graphics should not affect development ability or cost. ''

This is what I don't agree with at all.



ssj12 said:
archbrix said:

What irks me about this guy is that he basically contradicts himself; he says that the graphical capabilities need to be on par with current PCs to interest him, yet before that he says that even if the system is "way more powerful"than PS360, it's still not enough... guess he means it must be way, way more powerful?

Also the whole attitude that "even if one was donated to me, I wouldn't even open it out of the box"... seriously?!


if current consoles were on par with current PCs they would be capable of pushing way, way higher graphics, physics, effects, etc.

Especially if he is talking about Intel's beast skulltrail. Dual Core i7 995s plus two GTX590s... omfg you have power beyond power. I think it could nearly emulate the xbox 360 on it....

Yeah, that's why I said "he must mean way, way more powerful".

It's just a foolish thing for him to say, IMO.  There are many stages between being more powerful than a PS360 and on par with the most cutting-edge PC tech.  To say that the N6 could be way more powerful and that's still not enough is just expecting too much.  We all know Nintendo's not going to go the route of implementing whatever the highest specs available are right now in a system that's not even launching directly against an X720 or a PS4.  Why would they?  It would be too expensive and likely be outdone power-wise when the others do release their new consoles anyway.

If it was, by definition, "way more powerful than a PS360" (i.e. still not cutting-edge tech), and had enough RAM, they could deliver spectacular graphics and keep the cost of the system reasonable, especially when it would likely be launching with at least a year's head start on the competition.



FattyDingDong said:

No it's his second channel, his main channel NextGenTactics has over 3000k subscribers


u do know that angry video game nerd has over 500k subs?



Yeah i know my spelling sucks but im dysgraphic so live with it :3    

---------------------------------------------------Bets--------------------------------------------------

Conegamer - I say that the PS3 will beat the DS next week in Japan  (for hardware sales) Forfeit is control over others avatar for 1 week.