That's just what I'm saying, though. Everyone's jumping the gun. All we have are youtube videos and animated gifs. But the mere notion of "a game has PS3 exclusive graphics...on the 360" has taken the hype train insane. Because such a game hasn't existed yet

Swee jesus. Easily the best looking game on consoles, just like CVG said.

But if they used ps3 it would be a corridor shooter, have no HDR, no real-time GI, worse graphics, non-existant physics system and prerendered cutscenes and called Killzone 3

There's 7 in the intro alone man

naw man it look worse

LOL no man, the first open area in crysis 2 (not the largest) has more play area then most full levels of kz 2 and 3

crysis 2 is more like Halo Reach then Kz2/3

but you got very dated graphics and inferior effects, physics and lighting.  it shocks me that naughty dog is doing uncharted 3 and doesn#t even have real-time gi.

can't they at least do some lighting as well as a multiplatform game man?

Really, dude? Dated graphics? LOL.

Crysis 2 is nothing like Halo, its more like killzone from what I have seen with scarcity of enemies. And the intro is not the gameplay. What about texture pop-ins? 

And KZ2 looks better online anyone will tell you that.

"But if they used ps3 it would be a corridor shooter, have no HDR, no real-time GI, worse graphics, non-existant physics system and prerendered cutscenes and called Killzone 3"

LOLOLOL

Please stfu. Just do humanity a fucking favour and stfu, thanks. Its clear you don't know what you are rambling about. Uncharted 2 looks better than crysis 2, and has more open environments that are detailed then crysis 2. You traverse through a portion of Nepal in one level which isn't pre-rendered and you can definitely NOT see texture pop-ins. The whole area is very well made, along with the village. The village itself has more characters then the whole of crysis 2 (see what I did there?), the cows, the other non-related characters, all well detailed in comparison.

Killzone 2 has allies as well as enemies. There are like 5 allies that are well detailed along with your usual group of 4 extremely well detailed allies that itself makes it 9. Then their are enemies which are in huge nos, like 10 to 15 fighting against you which makes it 24. And that is with all the special effects and high textured environments like the ground and the walls.

Lets not even get into the the fact that crysis 2 on consoles is sub HD. 

And please, please show me this OPEN level of crysis 2 that you are talking about. I will show you an equally open level from killzone 2 or Uncharted 2 easily. Just try it.

Those gifs are absolutely fantastic nsanity!

Yeah it's like they're from 2009 or something

nah man it's more about the sandbox, everyone knows that, some of the battlefield games too - the killzone series has always been about corridor shootig

you laugh, but you have't explained how "using" the PS3 would get around these issues when the exclusives cant

its nice...for 2009, this is 2011 you gotta have real-time GI or you're admitting your visuals are inferior, you gotta be realtime or your admitting your graphics are inferior - can't they at least perform like a multiplatform game for baby jesus?

crysis 2 models are more details then kz3 models, they had to be for the real time cutscenes

crysis 2 body count goes up to 50

so given uncharted 2 and killzone 2/3 are only 720p, you're saying Lair has better graphics.

any level, it's the sand box man, you can go anywhere and do anything, its like halo or battlefield, kz is more like cod

IMO Naughty Docs should hire Crytek to help make their game about that explorer be more sandbox and get their lighting up to par - imagine uncharted 4: Drakes Haircut with these sorts of visuals *swoons*

Its not sandbox, you are clearly delusional. Its 2011, yet crysis 2 can't still match Uncharted 2's in game graphics, pathetic.

I suggest you go take classes in what is pre-rendered and what is real time, and Uncharted 2 is 720p and looks better then crysis 2, lair doesn't look better.

Alan wake is 540p with screen tearing and frame rate problems, LOL so much for being on a multiplatform engine on a console that's soooooo 2011.

So please, either give proof, that either crysis 2 has more enemies then Killzone 2(where's the proof for 50 enemies again?), show me a level that's open, or stfu, because just you saying that crysis 2 is a sandbox game doesn't make it so, heck even the devs themselves have admitted it not being a sandbox game.

So the next time you are replying, its proving its a sandbox game, otherwise don't bother. Because you clearly know only how to lie and not back up your talk.

Oh and while you are at it also give some examples for 2011 multiplatform games that are using real time cutscenes, because crysis 2 is definitely not doing so, if anything its Killzone 2 which had real time cutscenes on engine. Killzone 3 changed it to make it load faster just like Uncharted 2, and not because it looks better. If looks were what they wanted they could have gone CGI. 

sorry, i'd sooner listen to the actual developers when they say its a sandbox game then you who are ...you knooow

so if a 1080p game looks worse then a 720p game, that just confirms why uncharted 2 looks worse then a sub-hd game

just like god of war 2 at 576i looks worse than the xbox 480p chaos theory

don't know what all this is about man

you are the liar

so they just fit 90 minutes of HD1080P video in both 2D and 3D on a single DVD? lol

mmmkay, see this

see how they load from cutscene to gameplay without loading? i don't know why they downgraded it in killzone 3, but its a downgrade, a real console would do it all in real-time, but i guess kz3 was too much for ps3, thank jesus for the cryengine miracle to deliver us from sub standards.