Very few atheists make a positive claim that God doesn't exist. Functionally everyone in the world is an agnostic since they're without knowledge. That includes theists.

I however don't define myself by the fact that I can't positively prove that God doesn't exist completely and cannot know either way. Thats absurd. Firslty because no-one applies such thinking to things like fairies, which seems to be a form of special pleading only really applied in the theistic realm, and secondly because I think theistic claims can be looked into. God strikes houses with lightning because we sin? Nah, its a natural process that can largely be predicted, doesn't require God to work (gotta love a bit of razor action) and even if God was doing it, it can be easily stopped with lighting rods (what a weak God, why worship it?).

The claim God exists is made by theists. There is no evidence, thus I don't believe in it. I have no burden of proof because my belief is a negative. There is nothing illogical about being an atheist. To be correct, I would say I'm an agnostic atheist as is pretty much everyone. But the same would thus have to be said about thiests aswell. Ever heard a person call themselves an agnostic Christian? I doubt it (of course this being the internet I'm sure groups exist).

I just fall on the side of the fence that thinks that God probably doesn't eixst. And if we must look at the evidence, the God of the Gaps is an ever shrinking one. There is certainly more evidnece to say that God doesn't exist then does (or atleast if a God does exist, he's decidenly non interventionest and probably non-anthropic). But again, I'm not making the claim, I'm just rejecting the claim by theists because such an extraordinary claim should have extraordinary evidence.

I'm interested in what a person thinks, not some obsession over knowledge (which is rarely applied anywhere else) or the use of the word to reduce social stigma (and such agnostics do exist).

And please, don't conflate anti-theism with atheism.

ooooooooh i love how the people that believe science without question. Like how we were guaranteed the oldest human was 100k years, then going on and going on and now we are up to 2 million.

Oh and raptors, guess what they have feathers, look at jurassic park, hell the lost world it was only recently they realised that they had feathers. Science is a bunch of theories until proven otherwise, and even then its not proven. It is simply a new discovery.

You can not simply criticise religion "theories" if you are trying to use science "theories" in defence.

Bold - 

And that's exactly why science works so well. Science isn't a set series of ideas, that are forever unchanging and never to be questioned. Science will always adapt to the new evidence, and with every generation of scientists that passes the theory will be more correct than it was before.

The argument you use to ridicule science is exactly the same reason why it works so well. All it does it expose a certain mindset you have.

Also, if people "believed" science without question like you claim, then science wouldn't work the way it does. Science is built on scepticism and enquiry.

Italics - 

As for your last part, religious theories and scientific theories are two completely separate things.

Scientific theories are explanations of phenomena based on facts and evidence, when new facts come along, the theory changes to fit. They are not the same as religious theories.

I said it to get something off my chest before it even got on my chest

Bold - 

And that's exactly why science works so well. Science isn't a set series of ideas, that are forever unchanging and never to be questioned. Science will always adapt to the new evidence, and with every generation of scientists that passes the theory will be more correct than it was before.

The argument you use to ridicule science is exactly the same reason why it works so well. All it does it expose a certain mindset you have.

Also, if people "believed" science without question like you claim, then science wouldn't work the way it does. Science is built on scepticism and enquiry.

Italics - 

As for your last part, religious theories and scientific theories are two completely separate things.

Scientific theories are explanations of phenomena based on facts and evidence, when new facts come along, the theory changes to fit. They are not the same as religious theories.

Smart move! You fulfill the German stereotype of being efficient.

Except that i am not German

Austrian?