darthdevidem01 said:
9/10
I saw this one after Episode 1 and liked it...but didn't like it as much as Episode 1. Not anywhere near enough Jedi, no coruscant. I wasn't that interested in the rebels fighting against the Empire.....my mind was full of things from Episode 1 with the Senate, droid army, Jedi temple, awesome planet of Naboo. Episode 4 didn't have any of that at all.
Special effects were clearly lacking compared to Episode 1
After seeing Darth Maul vs Obi-wan/Qui-gon.....the lightsaber duel between Darth Vader and Obi-Wan felt awful.
What it did have was the two awesome characters, Darth Vader and Han solo, he stole the show in every way possible, each scene with him in it was awesome. In the end though it was still better than most films I'd seen up till that point.
It was very hard to digest that Darth Vader was the little kid from Episode 1 when my dad told me that.
|
To me, this is the most interesting post, so far. I don't know fans who saw the ep 1 BEFORE ep IV. I am 40 years old and I experienced all the cultural phenomenon behind Star Wars.
You know, 1977 Star Wars kindda created science fiction in movies. Ok, I exagerate, but it is true that the genre was pretty much dead back then.
All science fiction movies were B movies and the plot was basicly aliens landing on earth OR the earth in the distant future. Lucas borrowed elements of epic mithology like those from "The Lord of the Rings" and put them " a long time ago in galaxy far far away" with space ships, laser guns and swords of light. AND in middle of the historical context of the COLD WAR. Is funny how Reagan used Star Wars as propaganda tool, calling the USSR an "evil empire". Very, very funny, because Lucas was actually refering to his own country, the USA, a good democratic republic which eventually will turn into an evil empire. But I digress...
Episodde IV:
10/10 to me. The orgasmovie. You know, with the death star being nailed by the hero...
And about the post of darthdevidem01...
Well I do think that original trilogy is better, but just for a bit. Episode I is very good in showing us so much more of this galaxy and sure, the battle against the youngest and more powerful sith warrior we have seen so far in the saga (Darth Maul) was sure epic. But the ending is not that great. It was bitter sweet. They killed the best actor of the new trilogy!!! (Liam Neeson) I like the guy who plays the emperor in the whole saga and Ewan MacGregor is great. I also love the beautiful Nataly Portman. But there is nothing like the chemistry between Harrison Ford, Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher. Their acting was what made the first trilogy better that the second
But everything started in 1977 with that low budget B movie called "Star Wars"