Sadly, CoD has been a much better game than Battlefield Bad Company 2 and now Medal of Honor.  Like others have said, the game mechanics for multiplayer are all messed up, weapon damage is no where near accurate, lack of variety, kill streak perks that encourage camping and boosting even more than in CoD.

BC2 was ok but it was all a vehicle camp fest and again had the terrible weapon damage issues and lots of lag spikes.

You do realize that trade it back deal is only for used games, right?

i didnt play much of bc, but i love its sounds and the reciol and in the guns.

moh is like that because ea wants to please the market, all franchises are going mainstream even kz3, this pisses me off, what also pisses me off is that cod is highely acclaimed while its an average game, it might have lots of content but the base of the game is terrible.

How could they release a game with a spelling mistake in the UK? I though there were English (English) translators?

Yah because in the first part of the statement I was comparing MoH to CoD. In the second statement I was challenging your call for consumers to pick up Black Ops. I was saying Black Ops will not be nearly as good as MW2 was and their for will be an inferior product. Since I think MoH is better the MW2 except for lack of local multiplayer that means by default it will probubly be superior to Black Ops.

Wow thats low. I don't have experiance with shooters, lol I started playing shooters based in the StarWars universe on my Amiga. Later on I played Duke Nukem Doom and all the other titles like Turok (PC origionals). I played Unreal and GoldenEye when they came out and have been playing shooters steadily since. I've played every CoD game to date even Finest Hour and Big Red One. I've played them all and loved all of the ones by Infinity Ward but didn't care to much for Treyarch's or Spark's.

Since when do critics know best? I've seen bad reviews for good games many times in the past. You need to play the game yourself and then decide, especially when even here on VGChartz you have gamers who loved it and gamers who didn't. When theirs a mix like that you can't only listen to IGN.

The down sides to MoH are lack of customization to load outs and a lack of offline multiplayer. But the load outs aren't much of an issue my real issue with the game is lack of offline mutliplayer, it would have also been nice to have co-op gameplay but MW2 didn't have co-op campaign so I don't hold it against MoH!

The OP needs to calm down. I have the game and it is'nt all that bad. Just having MOH:frontline made the game worth getting to me. I've only played one level in the single player mode and I like the setting of it. Who cares if it's whack a mole type game play,would'nt it be that way in real urban combat. Enemies poping up out of no were. I agree with the Op in the multiplayer aspect of it. A couple of hits,then your dead. It should'nt be that way in multiplayer,which makes it harder to get points,which you need to get awarded with support actions/kill streak perks. The maps are small and weirdly designed,almost oval shape in some maps. So,yes the game is'nt top of the line,but it is'nt complete garbage in my opinion.