tuscaniman said:
|
Yah because in the first part of the statement I was comparing MoH to CoD. In the second statement I was challenging your call for consumers to pick up Black Ops. I was saying Black Ops will not be nearly as good as MW2 was and their for will be an inferior product. Since I think MoH is better the MW2 except for lack of local multiplayer that means by default it will probubly be superior to Black Ops.
Wow thats low. I don't have experiance with shooters, lol I started playing shooters based in the StarWars universe on my Amiga. Later on I played Duke Nukem Doom and all the other titles like Turok (PC origionals). I played Unreal and GoldenEye when they came out and have been playing shooters steadily since. I've played every CoD game to date even Finest Hour and Big Red One. I've played them all and loved all of the ones by Infinity Ward but didn't care to much for Treyarch's or Spark's.
Since when do critics know best? I've seen bad reviews for good games many times in the past. You need to play the game yourself and then decide, especially when even here on VGChartz you have gamers who loved it and gamers who didn't. When theirs a mix like that you can't only listen to IGN.
The down sides to MoH are lack of customization to load outs and a lack of offline multiplayer. But the load outs aren't much of an issue my real issue with the game is lack of offline mutliplayer, it would have also been nice to have co-op gameplay but MW2 didn't have co-op campaign so I don't hold it against MoH!
-JC7
"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer