Medal of Honor get a 6!

[nightsurge]

zgamer5 said:

Doobie_wop said:

I read the IGN review and had they taken away the title, I would have thought it was the review for Modern Warfare 2. Outside of the technical issues, it sounds like COD, except the MOH campaign is actually longer and seems pretty decent. I'm a huge Call of Duty fan and COD7 is already set and paid for, but even I can admit that some reviewers give the franchise far to much credit.

The Now Gamer reviews are written by two different people, that's why they have two different scores, one for the PS3 and one for the 360.

The game has also been getting 8's from every other site, it's far from being shit.

your a cod fan?

*shakes head and cries*

Sadly, CoD has been a much better game than Battlefield Bad Company 2 and now Medal of Honor.  Like others have said, the game mechanics for multiplayer are all messed up, weapon damage is no where near accurate, lack of variety, kill streak perks that encourage camping and boosting even more than in CoD.

BC2 was ok but it was all a vehicle camp fest and again had the terrible weapon damage issues and lots of lag spikes.