By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Church plans to burn the Quran on Sept. 11

WessleWoggle on 11 September 2010
sapphi_snake said:
WessleWoggle said:
sapphi_snake said:
TheRealMafoo said:


In the US animated child pornography in and of itself, is not against the law. It's against the law to transmit it across state lines, or distribute it on a computer, but it's not against the law for you to own it.

It's one of those things were I would worry about someone if they had it, but then again I kill hundreds of people a day in video games, and it's not like I want to kill anyone in real life.

As long as the people who own this material never inflict anything on anyone else, I say who gives a shit?

Well I guess that's an OK view. Personally though I wouldn't let someone who had animated child pornography near my kid sister.

What if it's yaoi(boy on boy) animated child pornography?

If it involves kids that's a big no no! Can't you just watch yaoi with grown men depicted?

Well if it's grown men then it isn't yaoi, yaoi is boy on boy not man on man.



Around the Network
sapphi_snake on 11 September 2010
WessleWoggle said:

Well if it's grown men then it isn't yaoi, yaoi is boy on boy not man on man.

I always though yaoi was homoerotic anime that Japanese girls were crazy about. Are Japanese girls paedophiles?



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

WessleWoggle on 11 September 2010
sapphi_snake said:
WessleWoggle said:

Well if it's grown men then it isn't yaoi, yaoi is boy on boy not man on man.

I always though yaoi was homoerotic anime that Japanese girls were crazy about. Are Japanese girls paedophiles?

Yes.



sapphi_snake on 11 September 2010
WessleWoggle said:
sapphi_snake said:
WessleWoggle said:

Well if it's grown men then it isn't yaoi, yaoi is boy on boy not man on man.

I always though yaoi was homoerotic anime that Japanese girls were crazy about. Are Japanese girls paedophiles?

Yes.

Oh my! O_0



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

zarx on 11 September 2010
WessleWoggle said:
sapphi_snake said:
WessleWoggle said:
sapphi_snake said:
TheRealMafoo said:


In the US animated child pornography in and of itself, is not against the law. It's against the law to transmit it across state lines, or distribute it on a computer, but it's not against the law for you to own it.

It's one of those things were I would worry about someone if they had it, but then again I kill hundreds of people a day in video games, and it's not like I want to kill anyone in real life.

As long as the people who own this material never inflict anything on anyone else, I say who gives a shit?

Well I guess that's an OK view. Personally though I wouldn't let someone who had animated child pornography near my kid sister.

What if it's yaoi(boy on boy) animated child pornography?

If it involves kids that's a big no no! Can't you just watch yaoi with grown men depicted?

Well if it's grown men then it isn't yaoi, yaoi is boy on boy not man on man.

common misconception, caused by the fact it as known as "boys love" in japan it actually refers to manga depicting homosexual relationships between pubescent males and commonly depicts 20-30 year olds. Shotacon depicts prepubescent boys.

and yes the fact I know this disgusts me a little bit lol...



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!

Around the Network
TheRealMafoo on 11 September 2010
sapphi_snake said:
TheRealMafoo said:


In the US animated child pornography in and of itself, is not against the law. It's against the law to transmit it across state lines, or distribute it on a computer, but it's not against the law for you to own it.

It's one of those things were I would worry about someone if they had it, but then again I kill hundreds of people a day in video games, and it's not like I want to kill anyone in real life.

As long as the people who own this material never inflict anything on anyone else, I say who gives a shit?

Well I guess that's an OK view. Personally though I wouldn't let someone who had animated child pornography near my kid sister.


I wouldn't either. I also wouldn't let the guy who wants to burn these Quran's around my kids. 

There are millions of people in the US I am sure I would not like in my life because of there behavior. That's not reason to make there behavior illegal, just because I don't like it.



sapphi_snake on 11 September 2010
TheRealMafoo said:
sapphi_snake said:
TheRealMafoo said:


In the US animated child pornography in and of itself, is not against the law. It's against the law to transmit it across state lines, or distribute it on a computer, but it's not against the law for you to own it.

It's one of those things were I would worry about someone if they had it, but then again I kill hundreds of people a day in video games, and it's not like I want to kill anyone in real life.

As long as the people who own this material never inflict anything on anyone else, I say who gives a shit?

Well I guess that's an OK view. Personally though I wouldn't let someone who had animated child pornography near my kid sister.


I wouldn't either. I also wouldn't let the guy who wants to burn these Quran's around my kids. 

There are millions of people in the US I am sure I would not like in my life because of there behavior. That's not reason to make there behavior illegal, just because I don't like it.

Were people actually people discussing making Qu'ran burning illegal??? I though the point of this thread was to discuss whether this gesture is counter-productive or not.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

tolu619 on 11 September 2010

Today's the D-day! Any news on how it went down?



http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/7530/gohansupersaiyan239du.jpg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"> http://www.deviantart.com/download/109426596/Shippuden_Team_7_by_Tsubaki_chan.jpg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"> http://image.hotdog.hu/_data/members0/772/1047772/images/kepek_illusztraciok/Bleach%2520-%2520Ishida%2520Uryuu%25201.jpg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash">

3DS: tolu619

Wii U: FoyehBoys

Vita, PS3 and PS4: FoyehBoys

XBoxOne: Tolu619

Switch: Tolu619

Kugali - We publish comics from all across Africa and the diaspora, and we also push the boundaries of Augmented Reality storytelling. Check us out!

My thread for teaching VGC some Nigerian slangs

TheRealMafoo on 11 September 2010
sapphi_snake said:

Were people actually people discussing making Qu'ran burning illegal??? I though the point of this thread was to discuss whether this gesture is counter-productive or not.


Yea, someone was equating burning the books to that of looking at child porn. It's how we got on these weird tangent.

As for being counter-productive, depends on the mans goal. For his goal, I think he has been extremely productive.

If I had to guess what's running though his head, it would be that he links terrorist attacks to Islam. He feels the government has been doing an effective job at removing that link.

He has done an outstanding job of undermining that. It would have been counter-productive, if he burned the books, and no one cared. Then he would have proved Washington's point.



IMU1808 on 11 September 2010

So how's the burning going?