sapphi_snake on 11 September 2010
TheRealMafoo said:
sapphi_snake said:
TheRealMafoo said:
In the US animated child pornography in and of itself, is not against the law. It's against the law to transmit it across state lines, or distribute it on a computer, but it's not against the law for you to own it.
It's one of those things were I would worry about someone if they had it, but then again I kill hundreds of people a day in video games, and it's not like I want to kill anyone in real life.
As long as the people who own this material never inflict anything on anyone else, I say who gives a shit?
|
Well I guess that's an OK view. Personally though I wouldn't let someone who had animated child pornography near my kid sister.
|
I wouldn't either. I also wouldn't let the guy who wants to burn these Quran's around my kids.
There are millions of people in the US I am sure I would not like in my life because of there behavior. That's not reason to make there behavior illegal, just because I don't like it.
|
Were people actually people discussing making Qu'ran burning illegal??? I though the point of this thread was to discuss whether this gesture is counter-productive or not.
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
