The 360 is $199 at entry price..

so no they aren't equal, and if you throw the "BUT THE 360 SALES CMOING FROM RIGHT NOW CAME FROM THE $299 MODEL"

well what makes you think normal 360 gamers aren't upgrading to the "360 "s" causing higher sales? I mean you did it right?

XD, you do know that there are virtually no $199.00 360s left right? And that MS killed that SKU the day they released the slim. And I love how you are now saying that 360 owners are upgrading to the slim, but when anybody dared say that about the PS3 slim, they were ridiculed, called a fanboy, insulted, and dismissed by your kind. It's telling...very telling.

Nope, I still originally had the original model, it broke and Future Shop replaced it with an HDMI model, and thats been problem free for quite some time now. I would never buy two of the same console, and I think most people would probably get a PS3 instead of "upgrading" their 360.

No, I'm not under that assumption. What I do know at this moment is 2011 is looking like a MUCH better year for Sony than it is for Microsoft. I also think that you guys are relying on Kinect too much to carry the 360 on, as with Fable 3, which definitely won't be as much as a system seller as Halo Reach. So what do you have after this Christmas? Gears and thats it? Then what? Kinect exclusives? If that's all Microsoft has for 2011, I'd be a little bit worried, because Sony will probably have a few surprises in for you.

What's your point? Doesn't Sony have a "MUCH better year" every year? Is 2011 some how even more spectacular than all the others years?

As I said before, you don't know what MS has coming after the Holidays. And once again you underestimate them by saying Gears is all they have coming. Why promote future games when MS already has a lot coming for 2010?

Every year the 360 gets great exclusives. I don't see why 2011 is gonna be any different.

P.S.3>360...It could happen in 3 years or it could happen in 2 years or 5 years but all I know is that it will happen someday.

PS3 is already a commercial failure in every aspect. Sony has already suffered irrecuperable losses with it along the years (just recently Sony managed to have some margin of profit over each unit sold).

That alone would be disastrous. If you take into account the fact that Sony held the virtual monopoly of consoles with PS2, it just aggravates the disappointing sales of PS3. So, EVEN IF it manages to outsell the 360 by the end of this generation (which is not a certainty whatsoever), it is still one of the biggest commercial flops in videogame history.

Oh yeah, before I forget, I own both a 360 AND a PS3. 

Actually looking online at some exclusives, 360 does have a pretty decent 2011 lineup, it's just that Sony advertizes games comming out in the distant future, where Microsoft does not. I mean have you heard any information about Huxley, Forza Kinect, Kingdoms, Kingdom Under Fire, Dead Island, Crash Time 2, Mech Warrior, Demons of Mercy, Dungeon Hero, Prey 2, Duke Nukem, Risen, or Theseis among others? Also Microsoft tends to announce big games late. Forza Motorsport 3 was annouced in E3 2009 and was released in October 2009, Gears 2 was announced in April 2008 and released in November 2008, etc.

Yeah, MS likes to keep their cards close to their chest. It's a good way to keep their competitors guessing. Sony can't even keep their secrets from leaking and they always spill their beans years before games are even ready to be shown. It's a good way to keep your die hard fans interested.

Two strategies that seem to work.

Although, Sony fans make the mistake of thinking MS doesn't have anything in the future because they are used to Sony's way of doing things. MS is just as commited as Sony but they'd rather sell the games they have out now than the ones coming next year. They know they'll have plenty of time next year to sell next year's games.

No I'm saying if we are talking lifetime 360 doesn't have a chance, and if they both stay on the market awhile longer ps3 will eventually overtake 360