Slimebeast said:
vlad321 said:
Slimebeast said:
vlad321 said:
Someone posted a link to a very recent interview about SC2. Now all the utter bullshit and crap (seriosuly, SC2 is gonna be shit whichever way you try to spin it) .
multi-player is very lackluster, definitely not something made over 12 years)
|
vlad321 said:
Been playing thebeta for some months now, and the horrendous bucket of crap that Bet2.0 is aside, this game is very underwhelming. Really, Warcraft 3 feels like a better game right now, and the moment you log into the WC3 bnet you shouldn't even think about twice about SC2. The sole saving graces SC2 can have now are the custom games (which may become paid if you read the interview) and the single-player.
|
Can u elaborate on why it sux?
|
Take Starcraft, dumb it down, change some units around, and you have SC2. For instance, the main support units, high templar, raven, and the infestor are just barely above useless. They are nothing compared to the Sciene vessel, HT, ad defiler from Starcraft 1 in what can be done with them. The balance is also off, whatever Blizz says, zerg have piss-poor air, many protoss units are utterly overpriced for how useless they are (Archons absolutely blow for instance). Terrans are the only race that feels like it's actually rounded off in terms of cost/use and just general usability. I play random btw so I don't really have a favorite race.
I mean just overall, the game feels like Starcraft 0.5. Not counting the fact that Battle.net 2.0 is worse than Gamespy. Either Blizzard has started sucking hardcore at making games, or they are saving up content for the next 2 releases. In either case, Wings of Liberty is worth no more than $30 as a package. They could have pushed $40 even.
Honestly, if it wasn't for the pile of shit that Bnet 2.0 is, this game would be so much better.
|
Okay, pretend for a moment that balancing will be fixed. Because we can assume that it's in Blizzards main interest to keep its legendary RTS superbly balanced, and balancing can sometimes be tweaked through patches later anyway.
Now you still have your criticism towards the quality of the game. My next question is, why do you think Blizzard made Starcraft 2 that way? A "Starcraft 0.5" and "dumbed down". What do you think is Blizzards motivation?
|
Balancing aside, currently when you play there just aren't enough viable units. When playing against Terran you will just about almost always see dozns of their tier 1 units, or banshees. Protoss you will see dozens of their tier 1 units, or void rays. With zerg you will see dozens of their tier 1 units, or mutalisks. Maybe, just maybe, if you play long enough you will see a thor/BC, cruiser/colossus, or a brood lord. But what I just described is literally everything you can expect in the game currently.
Archons just absolutely suck for the price. Psi storm is very weak compared to SC1 and combined witht he shitty archon the HTs are alamost useless. Dark Templar are a huge gamble because by the time you get the the other person will already have their detectors. Ultralisks are not worth the money, and infestors are just barely a nuisance, nothing like the defiler from SC1. Same thing for the Terran basically. There are just not very many viable strategies in the game with the way it is now.