I think it is of importance to note that excitement about Move and excitement about Move's current games isn't the same thing, because even if someone likes motion controls and doesn't care which system the game is on, what has been shown so far isn't anything special. Another important point is that the vocal minority that hypes Move for its superior technology isn't exactly excited about the games shown so far either.

The motive behind praising Move in its current form (which means everything we know about it so far) is most likely the wish that it slows down or stops Nintendo's success with the Wii (the same thing applies to Natal and the hopes that are put in it). It's just like a game that gets hyped not because the person who enthusiastically talks about it actually wants to buy it, but rather what it could do for the success of the console it is on.

There's not much of a reason to believe that Move will offer something special in the future. Quite the opposite is the case, there are many reasons to expect Move to flop spectacularly in sales and also in terms of the games it will get. Some that come to mind:

1) As a peripheral, there won't be a lot of third party support, much less good one. Sony supposedly has great relationships with third parties, but if you look at the entire Eyetoy/PS Eye library and the support of the Sixaxis (the standard controller), nobody should get his hopes up.
2) Without good third party support, the burden to drive the installed base lies on first party games. Now who really thinks that Sony will put their best developers on Move games aside from optional functions that have pretty much no effect on the core gameplay?
3) So the hopes rest on games with good tacked on motion controls, because there will hardly be any big projects specifically developed for Move.
4) The current lineup looks like Wii third party games (not graphically, but the kind of quality they offer). Which brings me to my next point.

It's commonly said that sports and party games are eaten up by the "casuals". Then someone quickly names Carnival Games, Game Party or Deca Sports and concludes that these are the types of games that are sure bets on the Wii (to prevent possible confusion: you didn't say that, I am talking about a general observation here). Regarding that I must ask: What's the batting average for these kinds of games? Then you look at a long list of sports and party games on the Wii and realize that there are dozens upon dozens of such games with abysmal sales with only a few posting impressive numbers.

Third parties flooding the Wii with these cheaply made games got so bad that retailers told publishers that they wouldn't stock such titles anymore, because they do NOT sell. Move and Natal look as if Sony and Microsoft make the same mistake as third parties on the Wii. They hope to make some easy profits, but they actually do not understand what the people who they try to sell to want, be it "hardcore" or "casual" gamers.

That being said, you can still give Move and Natal the benefit of the doubt, but more than that doesn't seem justified at this point in time.

I also want Sony and Microsoft to leave the console business, but that doesn't mean that I can't put up a good argument.

If you disagree with what I said in my previous post, you could say why Move will possibly get better support than what I outlined.

Is there really so much insecurity? I've seen a few guys attacking the Move occassionally, but most Nintendo fans don't make the impression that they are afraid of Move. Because honestly, the games shown so far aren't better than anything on the Wii and the reactions from the gaming media were describing many things that were wrong with these games.

Of course Move triggered a lot of discussion, because suddenly the Wii was back in the console war again. Similar to Natal, there were threads predicting that huge trouble is ahead for Nintendo now that the HD consoles got motion too. Now if something looks like it has no chance to be a threat, but it's still presented that way, it pisses people off. Nintendo fans were angry at analysts for predicting the Wii's downfall too, but over time they just laughed about this idiocy. It's possible that the same happens the closer we get to Move's launch.

Ultimately I think the best way to end this here is to turn the tables around, because that usually helps people to understand the others' point of view. Why were Sony fans so angry with Forza 3 for such a long time? Why was there so much hostility on these forums even though Forza 3 never was a real threat? Or why were 360 fans so angry with Killzone 2?

I should have brought that up much sooner, would have saved us a lot of time.

I think am insecure about there being insecurity on the behalf of Nintendo fans. I don't want to believe that, so I keep mentioning the Move games, because they really shouldn't be the cause of insecurity, in case there is some.

But no, you misunderstood my point. It's not about stealing someone else's stuff, it's about people claiming victory where there is no victory to claim and that makes others angry. There were 360 fans touting Forza 3's superiority just like there were Sony fans who claimed that Killzone 2 is a much better game than any FPS on the 360 without any substantial proof to back it up, but rather opinion passed off as fact. That's what caused the most controversy. But are the people who disagreed insecure because they said that the competition first has to prove that it is an actual threat before others claim it to be one?

but you have another good point! The Sony fans felt probably like Forza was stealing Gran Turismo from them, and in turn the Microsoft fans feel like Killzone was stealing Halo, and now the Nintendo fans feel like Sony is stealing their motion controls.

Link?  I've seen a third party controller like that, but I've heard nothing of an official controller with Motion Plus built in.