7/10 - One of my least favorite FF's. Not because it's bad, I just prefer the sword and sorcery setting and dislike steampunk/magicpunk settings. The characters are also kind of ugly stereotypes, and not in a good way. The other problem is the graphics, which fall into that "sure was neat at the time" category, the static backgrounds with the ugly character models to me is unforgivingly bad now. Better than FFXIII though, I can tell you that.

you obviously have not played the game wait a minute.. you don't even own a single playstation console so.. ?

@twesterm

i will nt make threads for them just for 2 votes.

i can also say its sad ppl like u exist who didnt see how gud ff7 is as a game.

@commonman

characters were new nd fresh for the time. but we disagree as i see ff7 and ff13 as the best but u see them as the worst. rate graphics like they were back then, back then they were the best at the time.



At commomans vote:

Average so far - 8.71 (too low) :(

I can see what you're saying. I'm going to give it a go when I get a chance to download it on my PS3, since I haven't played it since whenever it came out, maybe I'm being harsh because of some bad memories (I remember I almost broke my controller because of ruby f***in' weapon )

Fair enough I tend to rate FF games very highly as I love all of them.

I rate no game except MGS4 a 10/10 and the best JRPG is FF6 at 9.9

Every FF Main game I have played is at the least a 9/10 (lowest being FF12 at 9) 

Do you rate any game a 10/10?

And like leo-j said lol did you have a Ps1? roflroflroflorlforlforlforolfl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I agree with point 1

I agree with point 2

and I questioned it because you said you would never own a playstation system. FF VII is avaialble exclusive for playstation (and PC and PSN)

and you are right about the experience, but as a general game I'd give it a 9.0

I guess you just don't get how sad it really is there's a large group of people that just assume the FF series really started at VII and the previous six don't matter in any way at all.

You may see it as obscure because you haven't played it (and probably laughably consider yourself some sort of authority on JPRG's, that's like someone seeing Phantom of the Opera and think they know musicals) but it just really shows how little you know that you ignore classics like those games because they weren't 3D (you probably thought Tactics was bad too).

What you're saying is like asking us to rate all the Mario games but ignore everything before the N64 because nobody played those and they aren't good anyways.  This thread is actually a little insulting.

And I am rating graphics as I did when I first played the game in, what, 1997?  They looked bad to me then and they look bad to me now.  Just because something is new doesn't make it good.

Rol, what do you think of VI?

9.1