With its poor campaign and the same online with prettier graphics doesnt do it any justice. It doesnt deserve a 9.5. Let alone  a 9.

It's Gamespot. The laundry list of games they have over reviewed and under reviewed are numerous and follow a pattern.

I thought the Metroid Prime 3 "controls work too well, points off!" thing was kind hilarious.

In the end who cares what some random game journalist with a totally different taste in games thinks. I personally would have given Halo 3 a 7 or so for being essentially a 1998 shooter in the same mindless vein as Serious Sam, especially coming only a year off from the 360 masterpiece Gears of War--just made it seem more archaic.

In the end the only thing that matters is your opinion. I personally think Operation Flashpoint was the deepest and best game ever made (not an FPS, but an infantry simulator), although some might call me crazy.

I can safely bet half the posters here haven't finished either Halo 3 and Fire Emblem...

I overreacted a bit... 

Oh is that the reason why they kicked R&C future its ass, because its a "sequel"? Too difficult for newcomers? WTF, what kind of stupid argument is that? All this time you hear those people complaining "WII games are too easy" and now "too difficult"?! Morons, it doesn't deserve a "6"!

I don't consider Gamespot to be reliable anyway. They overrate or underrate games too much IMO. For that, IGN is more reliable.

With Resistance Fall of man poor campaign and with suck balls online play with not so prettier graphics, it doesn't do it any justice. It doesn't deserve a 9.5 let alone a 9.

I can safely say I beat Halo 3....and I'm enjoying its multiplayer aspect too... and so are the other 4 million Halo 3 owners.

All IGN except Bozon.

How obvious:

http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages4/932999.asp

Check who is the lowest on the list.

Well here some GamesTM is the winner of giving the most retarted, lowest score you can imagine. Gamespot still second lowest.

http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages4/932369.asp

I'm curious about FE, never played it before, but if I get a copy I'll buy the GC FE as there's really no reason to pay double the cost for the Wii one. Aside from a different storyline, it's the same game. That is reason to dock the score IMO. Being hard is not if that's the nature of the game and suits the target market.

Honestly, I think FE should in future be re-envisioned or broken into smaller pieces and sold as episodes on WiiWare. (Where noobs would more likely try it out for $10 instead of $60)

jeez w29 it's not about your pesronal feelings here. It's about a review site that is being hypocritical to the limits. This hurts even more when reviewers are supposed to maintain an unbiased state of mind in their work. And don't you give me any crap that it's dumb to ask of that, these people are being payed for being neutral, if they can't even do that then off with them.