Out of 658 PS3 games listed on VGChartz, 68 of them are FPS.

Out of 807 360 games listed on VGChartz, 92 of them are FPS.

HD consoles see the same thing with FPS games, as the Wii sees with Party/Fitness games.

Um, it's good propaganda? And don't forget Nintendo stopped producing core games after Wii Sports became a success.

Ubisoft doesn't seem to know what they are doing though, instead of only making Just dance games they will shove a new Prince of Persia down our throats!

It is logical that sequels to Just Dance will come if the francise continues being successful, just as Ubisoft will make a Red Steel 3 if the second one is successful, and will make more PoP games if the Forgotten Sands one is successful.

A Just Dance 2 was announced about a month ago.
Every copy sold from now on is just icing on the cake.

To do that someone would have to actually... you know... play it.

The saddest part is you will now spend more time with your boyfriend's sister than with your boyfriend.

There is no image problem when it comes to Nintendo...they have games people want. For the hardcore/core (Zelda, Mario, Metroid, Brawl) or Casual (Wii Series).

How can a company with the highest rated games under its belt, and also the best selling games have an image problem?

HD systems seem to have an image complex. There hardcore/core games don't seem to sell as well as Nintendo's Core games.

There also isn't a lack of hardcore/core players in the wii's userbase...if Zelda can sell 5-7mil, Mario Galaxy 8+ mil, Brawl 9-10mil then there is a hardcore market on the wii.

3rd parties need to make the core games on the wii similar in quality to the Nintendo ones....and advertise of course. It would sell....=)

Except... Wii core games have been way outdoing their Gamecube compatriots.

The gamecube is what "destroyed nintendo core gaming".   It and the N64 anyway. 

The Wii is actually bringing core games back.

Monster Hunter is the ONLY 3rd party exclusive that is actually worth mentioning. However, like I said, name one game that would be like a GTA or Assassin's Creed that flopped and you can't (note, this doesn't mean actually AC or GTA, but games with the same production values). There have been 0 blockbuster attempts on Wii that have failed. Maybe this is because no one has tried, but if so, then you can't use it as an argument that they do.

Also, Just Dance 2 isn't an easy profit. Look at Shaun White Snowboarding. It was a HUGE success on Wii compared to PS360. So what did they do? More of the exact same thing and guess what happened, the Wii audience dismissed it because there wasn't enough change. Look at the Guitar Hero/Rock Band scene. The games were doing great (also doing great on Wii) and they kept on putting out more of the same, and now the most recent versions are flopping (in comparison and probably in general). If you look at the party sports games, they are selling worse and worse every single time. There is no guarantee that Just Dance 2 will succeed, and Nintendo has never once shown that repeat games will sell on the Wii. In fact, they've shown that ports from the previous generation flop horribly with the New Play Control series.

I'll bring up LAIR. The game was supposed to be EPIC, it was AAA, it had a big budget, it would save the PS3, and it didn't sell. In fact, it essentially put the dev right out of business. Now why put a bunch of money/effort into creating a new core game on PS3 with a risk of it bombing? You ask this question as if core games are a guaranteed sell on the HD systems but they aren't. The only reason we see more "core" games selling well on the PS360 is because they are actually put there. When it comes to multiplatform titles, they get put on PS3, X360, PSP yet the PSP version usually sells horribly (assassin's creed anyone, or the soon to be Dante's Inferno). There is no reason they need to shun the Wii because it "isn't powerful enough". Heck, Street Fighter IV is on iPhone and hopefully PSP, but still no mention of Wii even though it would work perfectly fine and Tatsunoko is selling well.

The Wii never had a chance to break any imaginary image that the industry put on the thing, because no one ever gave it a chance. Nintendo isn't kiddy, they are family and they make quite a wide range of titles from E-T (and publish a few M titles). They wouldn't stop a single GTA, AC, or FF from being put on the system, heck, they have the most violent murder simulator ever on the Wii. Because 3rd parties have refused to put the main titles on the system (or ever try once) there is a false notion that Wii owners don't want good games. Heck, Resident Evil 4 is about to pass the GC version, and all Capcom provides is a light gun test game (I like light gun games, but they don't make for a good test for other types of games) to see if the market wants more 3rd person horror games.

I don't have time to type more, but in summation, you can't say that Wii can't sell big 3rd party core games, when there are none, and you can't say that 3rd party core games are a safer bet on PS360. You also can't say that it is guarantee that kiddy party games will sell, as I can point out hundreds of those that have flopped too.

Thats not sad...

I can name a million things sadder in this world. She just bought a game she wanted to play...you know...to have fun.

@Norlead, why use Liar, that's just a bad game good gamers avoided unlike....

I would use Bayonetta instead, terrific game according to many, sold ok on the HD consoles.

As for not taking chances on the Wii, that's also on Nintendo, they really don't try to get these guys anyway. Sony and MS needs them, so they make sure they get these games, and actually put out a console powerful enough in 2010.
I do feel weird that for a first place console, the 360 is the console treated like the market leader, but Nintendo doesn't care nor do their fans, that's why I question why you guys keep buying their crappy games. Their party games are funding our big games, and I see something wrong with that.