Kyuu said:
No offense but you're engaging in semantics now. PS2 had a generational lead over PS1, Wii U didn't have that, hell the results weren't consistently better than PS360. It's like you expect every phrase I leave to be super specific and detailed. I expanded on what I meant and you insist that it's "incredibly weird". It isn't. Power is a factor, how that factor plays out is tied to other factors. Wii U wasn't from the same generation, so a slight and inconsistent power advantage over 7 year old systems was nothing to write home about. |
You may believe that, I just don't see that backed up by real world data. But maybe our differences are just the scale. I already said that WiiU was much more powerful than PS3/360 and Switch is more powerful than WiiU. Maybe that just suffices as the power difference you claim has to justify a new gen. And maybe that is true. I don't know, because never a major console was just on the level of previous gen consoles in term of technological abilities. You though compare the power increase of WiiU and Switch with the ones taken by Playstation and Xbox consoles and see in comparison these increases as insignificant. But these increases may just be enough to justify a new gen and after that other factors are more relevant.
So maybe you are right: if we ever see a console on the same powerlevel as last gen, then it indeed might stop this console from being successful. It just haven't happened yet, which is why I find no data for the claim power has a big influence.







