By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LurkerJ said:
JRPGfan said:



If you are too lax on preventing spread, those numbers could climb drastically.

But even the experts are telling you we're trying to flatten the curve rather than stop the spreading. The same number will be infected in both scenarios, more people will manage to survive if the curve is flattened. Flattening the curve will NOT alter the course of the disease or change the total number of infected individual.

The asian countries were able to contain the epidemic. That includes even China. They had to lock down the Hubei province, but the rest of the country had taken way milder actions and therefore wasn't bogged down economically that hard. So why only try to spread the time for infections, if we can defeat it completely?



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]