Wow, everyone claiming that a device A is x% more or less powerful than device B has no clue about how technology works. You could make a numbered claim for a synthetical benchmark. For instance that a device can render in a specific situation more polygons than the other device. But the next benchmark can bring results that are completely different. Different devices have usually a different focus, on which aspect they focus. So such claims are pretty much pointless.
Even more, as no one of us really has access to the hardware and these 'hard numbers' are completely speculation. Crack all the devices, run a SPEC-benchmark on all compared devices and we talk again. About that different compilers influence the results on a SPEC-benchmark. 
In the end, the discussion is even more pointless, as consoles are never bought for power. They are bought for games. So we could discuss, which game looks how good on which console. So far completely pointless, as both aren't released. Pointless even then, as this will not only influenced by raw power of the machines, but also by the effort put into the development of the game. and even more pointless, because better looking games make not better games.
So the best would be to discuss the games we like and which platform supports us with the best games we want to play. Depending on personal preferences I think all next-gen-platforms have something good to offer.
TL;DR: You can't play with raw power alone.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
