Thought this was interesting:

In hindsight, it’s still amazing to consider how Spider-Man: Homecoming actually happened. Two rival studios came together, without any significant exchange of money, to share a single character that benefitted both sides. Again, Marvel/Disney made no money from Homecoming’s box office. They simply got the satisfaction of getting to personally oversee the creative decisions made in putting the movie together, and subsequently crossover Tom Holland’s adorable Peter Parker into other various MCU movies. That kind of speaks volumes to Feige and Co.’s passion for these characters.

From the same article:

On February 9, 2015 a groundbreaking deal was announced. A new Spider-Man would debut in 2016’s Captain America: Civil War, released by Disney, and that same Spider-Man would star in a new standalone movie released by Sony in 2017, produced by Marvel Studios. The financial agreement reached was far less complicated than Marvel’s initial offer: each studio would fully invest in and keep the profits from its respective features, meaning that Marvel Studios makes zero dollars from Sony’s new standalone Spider-Man movies and Sony makes zero dollars from Civil War. Instead, the annual fee that Marvel pays Sony to keep the toy and merchandising profits to the Spider-Man character at Marvel would be reduced from $35 million if the new Marvel-produced Spider-Man movie grossed over $750 million (it did). Moreover, the two studios get the satisfaction of making a great Spider-Man movie while giving the character an added spotlight in multiple MCU films.

http://collider.com/spider-man-homecoming-marvel-sony-deal-explained/#tom-holland

My understanding is that Marvel proposed putting up 50% of the money to make the stand-alone spider-man movies in exchange for 50% of the profits and they would continue to feature the characters in their movies as well as give creative input. 

Personal opinion I wish the deal had gone through to the benefit of both franchises otherwise we will keep seeing spider-man movies every 5years 9 months so that Sony's rights to that character and the 900 other characters associated with him don't revert back to Marvel.

My understanding of this from a few videos and articles is that Disney not only wanted 50% of the profits from every main Spider-man movie's box-office but they also wanted 50% of every Spider-man-related movie, such as Kraven the Hunter, Morbius, Venom, Spider-verse, etc etc.

Regardless if you want Spider-man to be supervised by Marvel and for him to stay in the MCU, you gotta admit that deal is insane. No sane company with the movie rights to Spider-man would EVER make that deal. I can't really defend Sony's movie quality but I can certainly understand why they would back out of the deal with Disney.

So you're just gonna conveniently ignore the tidbit about Spidey 3 and both (Un)Amazing Spider-Man movies? Not to mention that was an animated film, huge jump from that and live-action, which they've fucked up since 2007. Also the leaked Spider-Man 4 script was terrible and would've garnered even worse reception than Spider-Man 3.

Plus it's Sony. Every attempt of theirs to start a franchise has fallen flat, Resident Evil, Jumanji, Ghostbusters, Men in Black. They WILL fuck it up eventually (it might not even take them long to do it judging by their track record, lol), that's just how they roll.

I take Sony also own the rights for spiderman video games?

Stock drops shouldn't be considered, remember Nintendo's stock dropping after the announcement of the Switch

Same here. Also, not just Spiderman, but to a lesser degree also the Hulk (Disney doesn't own the publishing rights of Hulk movies, hence why there's only one in the MCU)

And like I said in a previous post, I think Disney has gotten too big and needs to be cut down to size, preferably by making Marvel, including Marvel studios and all IP and ongoing contracts, it's own entity again, completely separate from Disney.

Wasn't only the first Ghost Rider made by Sony? I can't see any information about them making the 2nd one. 

As far as I'm aware, Marvel owns the rights to everything spiderman related outside of movies so I'm not sure why Disney feels the need to become so greedy. Not surprised Sony would decline any offer to split costs or profits.

Did you just include Jumanji? The new Jumanji film was a massive success. Critics, General audience and Jumanji fans liked it. Resident Evil was a critical failure but none of the movies flopped and is the highest-grossing video game movie series of all time.

No, they apparently asked Marvel if they could make Spider-man (and it exclusive) because of the film deal as since Activision Marvel contract ended, there seemingly was no Marvel games made at all (for consoles) outside of MvC and Lego games really.

I think Marvel will now be dealing in singular contracts for games, not just 1 publisher like the past. Which is why we are getting the Avenger's game from SquEnix, why we'll most likely see a Spider-man sequel on PS5 and hopefully they will expand their games market to include other things, maybe a fighter or something (would love to see a Marvel fighter made by Tekken team).