Quantcast
"Leaving Neverland": Do you think Michael Jackson is Innocent?

Forums - General Discussion - "Leaving Neverland": Do you think Michael Jackson is Innocent?

Thriller and Invincible or Bad and Dangerous

Good guy, wrongly accused 48 52.17%
 
Talented Bad guy 23 25.00%
 
A little of both. 21 22.83%
 
Total:92

Ever since more evidence like the Train Station story and the Robson's Grand Canyon trip came out disproving the allegations in the 'documentary', the International Media such as in countries like the U.K., Germany, France, and New Zealand (from what I've heard) have been jumping all over those latest reports. Meanwhile, most, if not all, of the mainstream U.S. media has been painfully quiet... USA Today? Wall Street Journal? New York Times? They were all quick to jump on the Leaving Neverland bandwagon. But now that the legitimacy of that documentary has been called out, revealed to have major credibility issues, and is now getting thrown in the wood-chipper. (crickets).
I didn't think it would be possible, but I finally agree with Donald Trump on something, the headache inducing joke that is the mainstream U.S. media. Fake News, indeed.

Even Oprah Winfrey, who did her After Neverland special where she allowed Dan Reed, Wade Robson, and James Safechuck to come on her show and gave them a platform to share their stories. She (or whoever is in charge of her social media accounts) deleted all her posts on Social Media about her special and the 'documentary', and she (or whoever is in charge of her YouTube page) deleted the videos she had related to those subjects from her YouTube playlist. I don't know about you guys or what her reasoning may be behind that, but that sure looks like Damage Control to me.

Has she interviewed Taj or Brandi Jackson? Neither one of them have made any mention of it if she has. Jermaine? Tito? Randy? Janet? Katherine? Any Jackson family member at all? Scott Ross, the Private Investigator for the 2005 trial? Tom Messereau, Michael's Defense Lawyer for the 2005 trial? Mike Smallcombe, the guy who debunked the Train Station story? Or any other defender of Michael to report the other side of the story since Michael is no longer here to defend himself? Especially in the wake of these revelations? Has she even tried? Still waiting, Oprah.

Last edited by PAOerfulone - on 06 April 2019

Pancho A. Ovies

Nintendo Switch in Japan (Media Create): 2018 vs. 2019
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=238945&page=2

PlayStation 4/Xbox One/Nintendo Switch: 2018 vs. 2019
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=239387

Around the Network

Of course he was pedophile, but the majority of people will always want to believe he was innocent.



PortisheadBiscuit said:
LurkerJ said:
Wasn't Latoya accusing her own brother of the same wrong doings at one point? Child erotica was found in his house? MJ never denied inviting children to his bed?

Too much smoke along the years. We really didn't need this documentary to question his innocence.

"Child erotica"? So now we're just making things up? lol 

The question mark is there for a reason. It's the difference between a statement and a question. I heard about the child erotica stories but I never bothered to investigate them, hence, the question mark. 

But it's great how you cherry picked child erotica out of the list and ignored the rest.

Last edited by LurkerJ - on 07 April 2019

Ofcourse he was innocent. He was rich!



Insert Coin. Press START. You Died. Continue?

The below explains everything by way of an actual confession..This is a must see video..Very revealing :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p8CgdRLnDQ



Xbox 360 and Xbox One

Gamertag:  GamertagOz70

Around the Network
3sexty said:
The below explains everything by way of an actual confession..This is a must see video..Very revealing :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p8CgdRLnDQ

LMAO! That video kept popping up in my recommendations a couple of weeks ago. When I finally watched it, I DIED! Wanted to hate it but I couldn't.



Twitter: @d21lewis  --I'll add you if you add me!!

okr said:
Of course he was pedophile, but the majority of people will always want to believe he was innocent.

I believe the reason why people strongly believe he was innocent is because there isn't sufficient evidence against him to prove his guilt.

SuperRetroTurbo said:
Ofcourse he was innocent. He was rich!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't he having financial problems at the time?

Also, I don't think being rich was the reason why he was found not guilty. I do remember hearing some people in the media making that claim due to the case ending differently than they wanted to, though.



SuperRetroTurbo said:
Ofcourse he was innocent. He was rich!

So Trump is god if you see it like that,strange that does not hold people back from accusing him right?

So i do not think you brought up a valid point.



okr said:
Of course he was pedophile, but the majority of people will always want to believe he was innocent.

Actually there is no conclusion one way or the other.  Its much easy to just believe someone is guilty then it is to prove it.  The thing is once a person is accused of anything, most people already make up their mind they are guilty without a shred of evidence. 



Machiavellian said:
okr said:
Of course he was pedophile, but the majority of people will always want to believe he was innocent.

Actually there is no conclusion one way or the other.  Its much easy to just believe someone is guilty then it is to prove it.  The thing is once a person is accused of anything, most people already make up their mind they are guilty without a shred of evidence

It's really unfortunate that some people do that. It's like as if there's no such thing as innocent until proven guilty anymore.