Games without any scores do not count: Souce Metacritic.

Switch - 40 reviewed games.

1 RED / 16 Yellow / 23 Green.

3 games 90 + / 13 games 80-89 / 14 games 70-79 / 9 games 0-69.

Highest rated game: Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild - 97 metascore.

Lowest rated game: Vroom in the Night Sky - 17 Metascore.

PS4 - 33 reviewed games. This would be as of February first 2014.

2 RED / 12 Yellow / 19 Green.

1 game 90+ / 13 games 80-89 / 6 games 70-79 / 13 games 0-69.

Highest rated game: flower - 91 Metascore.

Lowest rated game: Nba live 14 - 43 Metascore.

You should keep this up throughout their life cycles. It would be interesting.

Is this all games or first party games only?

All games.

Nintendo platforms typically launch strong with a healthy supply of First Party titles.

If they can keep up that AAA train of Nintendo blockbusters, it should present a decent challenge for the PS4. However, history dictates that Switch will likely experience long periods of time without any high profile releases, due in part to ONCE AGAIN releasing a platform in a different weight class than everyone else (thus making multiplatform releases of titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 next to impossible).

Nintendo has pretty good output then.  I hope they can keep it up.

I'm sorry but I have to ask this. Why do some of you put so much emphasis on mete scores?

Really?

Ps4 had relevant ip like

Assassins creed
Nba 2k
Outlast
Killzone
Call of duty
Battlefield

All in it's first 80 days (and I believe infamous as well)

The switch legit has sniper clips, minecraff, zelda, Mario kart 8, and that's about t in terms of relevancy....

That's just messed up.  You're supposed to do everything based on scores handed down by a small group of strangers.  That's how civilization works.  Go back to your ice cave until you can evolve some culture.