twintail said:
Mnementh said:
I never said EA didn't support the Wii. They actually had quite some games, more than you named. But I said it was irrelevant. I illustrated that by pointing out the top-sellers. I should have mentioned these barely sold above 1 million. EA-games didn't sell Wiis. And on Wii EA didn't make a big profit, as their games sold bad. So EA-support was mostly irrelevant then and there is not much proof, that says it should be different this time.
|
But you did pretty much say their support was bad, your own words: Knowing EA the support will be crappy anyways..
And next time you wat to do video game number research, please do it properly. EA Sports Active, a Wii exclusive, actually did close to 4 million according to VGchartz. Q1 of 2009, they sold 1.8 million WW - official EA numbers
According to Vgchartz, the spin off title, and the sequel would both do above a million each on the Wii. In fact, not including those 3 games they would have, according to vgchartz, an additional 18 titles that woud hit a million sales.
And FYI Monopoly and Mysims didnt just barely sell above 1 million as you just claimed. MySims is at 1.65 million and Monopoly is at 1.89.
So no, you are straight up wrong, or purposely misleading facts because you dislike EA. EA supported the Wii hard and strong and got a lot of sales from doing so.
|
The VG-Database on VGC didn't came up with EA Sports active as I searched for publisher EA and Wii. So, they had a better selling game. But do you know why I needed the search in the first place? I remembered that EA actually did have a lot of games on Wii, but I didn't remember a single name. Not one game was memorable. So, I said the support will be crappy, because I think it was on Wii. Quantity, sure, was OK. But the quality of the games? Not one memorable game. Not much of a budget for all the games. And just look at FIFA: did EA invest some resources to make it a good port that actually plays to the strengths of the Wii? No, they were cheaping out. Hence the ridiculously low sales of FIFA on Wii. Still enough to moake money on the crappy port I'm sure, but nowhere near the sales on other platforms. If you think EA-support for Wii was substantial, then tell me, which games from EA you bought (or wanted to buy) for Wii and liked?
To show that I'm not senselessly hate EA, just compare with someone else. Ubisoft invested money to create a new game for the Wii, that should play to it's strengths: Red Steel. Sadly this didn't work out too well. Then Ubisoft invested again and invented another game: Just Dance. This paid out very well. So compare Ubisoft and EA, two companies of similar size and importance and tell me, that the investments for games on Wii wasn't crappy on EAs part compared to Ubi.
And you completely avoided my main point anyways. I said initially and stand by it: EAs support is irrelevant. Because it never worked well on Nintendo platforms. The Wii was a success, but which of the games EA made sold any Wiis? Do you think EA Sports Active made people think: yes, the Wii is a platform I want for this game. The games sold to the existing base only. On the other hand: also for EA the Wii wasn't great. They made much more money off of other platforms. Compare again to Ubi. Ubi invested more and got more back. So: EAs support for the Switch will be irrelevant again, Ubisofts support will be more impactful.
And I get it you probably like EA. And you like their games. But do you like their games on Nintendo-platforms? Probably not. So open your eyes and see: EAs support for Nintendo-platforms is crappy as they don't invest in this platforms, EAs support is also irrelevant to success (Wii) or failure (WiiU) of Nintendos platforms. And Nintendos success is mostly irrelevant for EAs revenue.
3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)
my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023
10 years greatest game event!
bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]