By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Would you rather Starfox dropped the 2nd screen for better graphics?

Tagged games:

 

?

Yes, drop it 193 66.55%
 
No, keep it 97 33.45%
 
Total:290

The graphics of Starfox Zero have come under fire from gamers since its reveal, and part of the reason for their simplicity is so that the game can run two different perspectives across both the TV and Gamepad.

If it was up to you, would you want them to just drop the second screen idea to free up more processing power for graphics?



Around the Network

Vote yes!



No. And it's too late to change it now.



Absolutely, they are putting to much effort when nobody wants to see what´s on the tv in first person view.



                                                                                     

A THOUSAND TIMES YES. In this case the whole second screen thing seems really forced and un-fun. So now if I get the game I can look forward to lame graphics without even reaping their benefit, because the only way I'm playing it is the regular way. (And believe me, I'm all about using motion control etc. when it actually enhances the experience.)



Around the Network

No. Graphics always become dated. There may never be another game with this control set up.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo

Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.

Its 60fps. Thats all that should matter.



No. People always complain about horrid GamePad support. And now that Star Fox is offering it, people say get rid of it? No. The graphics look fine and will get better. Sure they could look better if the GamePad was dropped, but in 10 years what will you remember? The "amazing graphics" that would be outdated by then, or the awesome GamePad support that lets you play inside the cockpit? Pretty sure the GamePad support.



[Switch Friend code: 3909-3991-4970]

[Xbox Live: JissuWolfe]

[PSN: Jissu]

Probably but SF's graphical style would have become dated sooner in the end regardless, sacrificing a gamepad feature for something that will only look good for a limited time isn't worth such a trade off imo.



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

No. The game's graphics are fine. People act as if the game looks horrendous, when it at least looks as good, if not better than, other flight games on HD systems. Frankly, I think the game looks way better than, say, Ace Combat 6. Will it look as good as the best looking games on the Wii U? Probably not, but most of these games also didn't bother to do anything remotely interesting with the gamepad.

I for one welcome something UNIQUE being done with the Wii U game pad. I'm okay with the game looking a little less good for that. So long as it compliments (or doesn't get in the way of) the game play, there's really no reason to complain.

I mean, it's not as if the Wii U is a graphical power house to begin with. Every game released on the thing is instantly dated graphically, and has been for years. The compromise of graphics for a second screen is BUILT IN to the damn thing. Better they make the most of it then make it superfluous in yet another first party game.