By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Uncharted: The Nathan Drake Collection leaked via mobile PlayStation store!

Ari_Gold on 04 June 2015
Faelco said:
Ari_Gold said:


While its true that my opinion is subjective and i hate remasters, are you guys really downplaying the $60 price tag because you love the Uncharted franchise? It doesn't make sense to me, why anyone would get so hyped about wasting $60 to play the games they already played a few years back. If I'm giving people in the thread a reality check, and I sound negative, I'm deeply sorry, but i hate when publishers try to squeeze more dollars from their fans. I own the original trilogy for PS3, and I wouldn't buy a remaster for that price. 


You mean when a publisher is doing its job, or when a company try to make money? How dare they! 

If you're taking the side of a corporation, you probably have stock invested in them. To each his/her own I guess. 



Around the Network
Conina on 04 June 2015
true_fan said:

Exactly Halo is not named Master Chief 1 2 3.... The Halo collection is much different than Halo The Master Chief Collection. Uncharted has not featured a game without Nathan Drake, there was no need to try to seperate his name like there is some addition lore. Halo has ODST and Reach, which did not feature Master Chief.


But the "masterchiefless" ODST is in my Master Chief Collection... they tricked me. ;)



Barkley on 04 June 2015

Who gives a crap about the name... seriously.



Dr.Vita on 04 June 2015




Dr.Vita talks about Playstation Vita in 2016!
Playstation Vita Media Create Sales (2014 vs 2015 vs 2016)
Playstation Vita Japan Retail Software Sales (2013 vs 2014 vs 2015 + 2015 LTD Edition)
Prediction: Nothing will outsell PSP anymore (except Playstation home consoles)

ArchangelMadzz on 04 June 2015
true_fan said:
Hiku said:
true_fan said:
Hiku said:
tinfamous12 said:
Should've come up with a more original name, sounds too much like Halo: The Master Chief Collection.

And The Master Chief Collection sounds a lot like The Sly Collection, and Jak and Daxter Collection.

 

It's Halo The Master Chief Collection, which makes it different bcuase the name of the games is Halo. Sly is actually the name of the games.

Sly is also the name of the character. Same for Jak and Daxter. Speaking of desperate, you're reaching far now. It's not different. And these are but two of several other examples, both in videogames, and in movies.

That Xbox fans somehow think MCC was the first to name it this was is baffling.

Exactly Halo is not named Master Chief 1 2 3.... The Halo collection is much different than Halo The Master Chief Collection. Uncharted has not featured a game without Nathan Drake, there was no need to try to seperate his name like there is some addition lore. Halo has ODST and Reach, which did not feature Master Chief.

Now you're really reaching. They're using the main character's name. It's Uncharted: The Nathon Drake Collection. Not 'The Nathan Drake Collection' now please go back to ignoring many replies to your inconsistent arguments.



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

Around the Network
Fusioncode on 04 June 2015

They probably put Nathan Drake in the title so they can push the character and make him a bigger "name". Such a strange thing to complain about.



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

Dark_Feanor on 04 June 2015
Hiku said:
Dark_Feanor said:
Weird that Sony is using the same name pattern as Halo:MCC.

Well, may be they figured that MCC was a great success even with the first months problems with multiplay it´s possible the public is more interested in singleplay.

I guess Microsoft thought the Sly Collection and the Jak and Daxter collection were a great idea too.


You mean naming a colection with the name of the game + the main character?

Or do we have "Sly: The Sly Collection"?

And let´s not ignore that both game you mentioned are far far far below the level of Halo and Uncharted.

However, my point was that Halo:MCC made a little sence because there are other Halo games without Master Chief and that collection had a ton of ties with his history leading to Halo 5 and finishing with Halo 6.

IIRC Uncharted has a more episodic nature. Each game independent from the others with Nathan in all games.



Aura7541 on 04 June 2015
Dark_Feanor said:
Weird that Sony is using the same name pattern as Halo:MCC.

Well, may be they figured that MCC was a great success even with the first months problems with multiplay it´s possible the public is more interested in singleplay.

If Sony was using the same pattern, then it would've been called The Master Thief Collection.



true_fan on 04 June 2015
Fusioncode said:
They probably put Nathan Drake in the title so they can push the character and make him a bigger "name". Such a strange thing to complain about.

Thats actually a good reason imo.



celador on 04 June 2015

Called it regarding the collection not having multiplayer