Depends on whether their games deliver on all the hype or not. One thing is Watch Dogs, which is a new IP, other is AC and FC. They will most likely be liked all around.

they are getting close. I'm Nintendo for exclusives and PC for multi-plat so I am the demographic they are trying to piss off. I still like Ubisoft better then EA from a personal standpoint, but I would be more likely to buy Madden 16 over Assassins creed 2016.

Yes and no. The delays of Rayman Legends and Watch Dogs, and all the crappy ports they have done make me think that there's no difference between Ubisoft publishg games for Wii U and EA not publishing games for Wii U. 

your telling me to think things through yet you bought a ubisoft game on steam :/ ok

They dont give a shit about optimizing games properly.

At least they are still publishing a AAA game on Wii U. No other 3rd party publisher is.

It'll be Nintendo.

On the one side, people like curl will be pissed at them for one reason or another, and then from the other every other console owner (which will be millions) will be pissed at them for having all the good exclusives/games/60FPS/Captain Toad.

Oh, I'm sure EA has more than enough time to surpass Ubisoft in this regard. Not sure they're going to actually do it, but they have a good history of mistreating their customers.

EA is still worse.

The worst thing about Ubisoft is their treatment of PC gamers. Even EA treats PC gamers quite well when you compare them to Ubisoft. Origin does suck, yes. But at least Origin works. Uplay on the other hand, does not. And EA does a much better job with optimization of their PC games.

Ubisoft is quite bad for many reasons. For me, it's very hard to choose between Ubisoft, EA, or Activision as the worst 3rd-party publisher. Because all of them seem equally bad, if for different reasons.