I am not ashamed to admit I have no idea what a hypocratic oath is.

I suspect no one does.

True. But do you honestly think that EA would not support the WiiU if it was selling like warm bread? Or if some of their games would have sold in some respectable manner ( lets say 200-300k)?

Why is this bannable and considered as "Spreading filth" (Yet filled with stuff that can be proven) meanwhile we have thread after thread derailed and filled with ridiculous conspiracy theories based on absolutely nothing that can be proven and better yet it is continually done by the same guy who banned Dodece for this post?

I guess if you don't believe in conspiracy theories and decide to apply your thoughts towards a different possibility it is better to keep your mouth shut.

Go ahead. Tell me what exactly am I doing? Shouldn't be too tough since you're already here trying to make us look like shit for not agreeing with a conspiracy claim with no facts to back it up.

You tell Dodece that he has been spreading filth in threads. Well, what do you call this post you just wrote?

I should clarify that the ban is not that actual post, but that Dodece's been running this same line for like two weeks straight. Fair to say we're all quite sick of it.

I also said that some of you are good posters believing in some unfortunate misconceptions. Most of them, however, are the "know what they're doing" people.

A shame but outside of Mass Effect, Madden and FIFA, it isn't a massive loss. EA has sort of soiled all their other franchises of note beyond redemption for a few years.

Not to mention, EA is so shady if Nintendo pulls a miracle and starts to sell well enough again, they will be compelled to try. So meh, classic EA and aside from spreading rumors about the Wii U not being able to handle stuff available on current generation platforms it is probably better then what they did on the Wii where they dropped subpar PS2 level software and whined about it not selling.

EA dropped the SEGA Dreamcast like a bad habit.............

Electronic Arts was one of the notable developers that did not publish games for the Dreamcast. Although EA had long supported Sega's earlier consoles, and this partnership has been attributed to EA's emergence as one of the dominant players, it had suffered losses from the Sega Saturn and its premature discontinuation.

During negotiations, EA was irked by Sega's indecision over hardware, including which graphics chipset and whether to include a modem. One EA executive said "there was a push from Sega, which was having cash flow problems, and they couldn't afford to give us [EA] the same kind of license that EA has had over the last five years. So EA basically said, 'You can't succeed without us.' And Sega said, 'Sure we can. We're Sega.'

There was disagreement between Sega and EA over sports games. EA knew that hardware manufacturers were at risk when launching a new console, and would use such situations to EA's advantage. EA's then-president Larry Probst (a close friend of Sega's Stolar) noted wide competition to EA's sports franchises and wanted five year exclusive rights for EA to be the only sports brand on Dreamcast. However Sega America's president Bernie Stolar had a strategic plan that included Visual Concepts (a company that Sega purchased for $10 million) as a key element for the Dreamcast, and Stolar believed that Visual Concept's upcoming NFL title would be superior to EA's Madden NFL series. Sega offered to lower the royalty rates that EA would pay for publishing its titles on the Dreamcast but Probst would not budge on the exclusivity deal.

And now they have completely abandoned Nintendo.

SCREW YOU EA.......... arrogant tossers.

So then do us all a favor and prove how we are believing in some unfortunate misconceptions.

Prove to us how your conspiracy claim is truth. You come into these threads all the time and have been doing so for weeks and have yet to prove how yours is anything more than a "unfortunate misconception".

You can't just claim our views and thoughts are wrong simply because you don't like them. They hold much more water than a claim of butt hurt execs hating Nintendo and trying to destroy them.

So these types of comments are allowed now?