Dont say such silly things. The mod team is already hugely biased towards Sony, remember? That would be overkill!

There is this one moderator who just loves to ban people who does not like his console of choice. A true partizan.

I think they're not banning enough people.

I have to say that Zanewards ban in this thread
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=158639&page=1

Is pretty ridicilous.. If thats the new baseline you could ban 30% of the posters in any thread

Sure it's not a personal thing you had in a political thread instead of the actual performance of the mods?

As I said in another thread but got no answer by Kantor, I'm sure that if someone said something like this "Anyone who stands against that is a traitor to heterosexuals, and they were once dealt with appropriately, in a time when people were bolder." or "Anyone who stands against that is a traitor to whites, and they were once dealt with appropriately, in a time when people were bolder." the outcome would be very different to the one we got with this post by a mod: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5269861

PS: I'm going to "implicitly" say that some mods behavior is garbage so the mod team will only have a word with me, right?

No problems, still, and I'm glad we have the mods that we have.

Only thing I'd say is if someone's being moderated, I think there should always be as full an explanation as possible of why they're being moderated. I've seen a couple of cases where it's just been labelled with one word or something equally unsubstantial.

I still maintain that that wasn't a threat against you. I simply should have been more clear.

Though that incident (and several others) demonstrated that i need to stop letting adversity get to me to such a great degree.

The fun part is all the times you get reported (like today) and i still let it drop, despite how many times you've (explicitly) insulted me now and in the past.

Hell, i've made similar threats against union-busters (living union-busters, too, unlike her overrated-ness). It is not right of me to do so, i agree, but it was not a threat against you.

Again, poor wording on my part. For they are not "threats" in the sense that anyone is actually planning to do anything, but rather "the wrath of the people could fall upon them if they don't change their ways," sort of thing. Nor were there more than one of them, as i recall (Scott Walker).

I really shouldn't get as mad as i do about this sort of thing, and rather regret it as i do like to maintain respectability, but your determination to misunderstand this incident has further soured my view of you (which was pretty down there to begin with. Insulting my employment history is, understandably, a bit of a third rail).