By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - The Vgchartz ranking game--The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (results are in)

 

Thoughts on Skyrim.

Game of the year and beyond! 34 41.98%
 
I used to like it, but th... 13 16.05%
 
Dem bugs 26 32.10%
 
So where's my DLC? 7 8.64%
 
Total:80
2000cc said:
Played the ps3 version

0 (yes zero) out of 10

Harsh, probably, but in my mind the game is unfinished so doesnt deserve a score. The bugs ruined the game for me beyond any hope of actual enjoyment. In my version of the skyrim world, Dragons were flightless and often invisible also while mammoths and NPCs levitated regularly. I must say I never picked bethesda to be an exceptionally creative company but the high flying heavy elephants & humans (who most of the time were only constrained by the roof of the dwelling they inhabited) & flightless Dragons was a very innovative idea, haha. Not only this but it appears the 'ye olde fantasy' skyrim world has some seriously futuristic forests, the trees would flash neon colours repeatedly while I walked around, it didnt feel like a fantasy world but more like I'd stumbled alongside an Aphex Twin or Basement Jaxx gig. I half expected a horde of 'E' popping ravers to come busting out of the 'woods'. The final immersion ruining bug was the game AI, playing a rogue style character with good sneak ability i'd regularly shoot people with arrows & they'd then say 'oh i must have just imagined it' with the arrow still poking out of them. Similarly killing someone who would fall dead beside a tavern dweller who was drinking warranted no response from said tavern dweller (EVERY time). It really was impossible to get into the world in any way shape or form because firstly it was a ridiculous world worthy only of a monty python skit & secondly it was so hard to affect anyway that I always felt one step removed.

and thats just the minor bugs, the serious ones that broke the game (eg the 1-5 frames per second lag & the save corruption bug that both came in at 25-35 hours to name a few) were much more annoying. For these reasons I consider the game unfinished & unworthy of a score. I'd much rather rate a demo as if it were a full game than give a score to this game (assuming the demo actually ran).

As for gameplay itself it was far too easy which again made it very hard to get into or take seriously in any way, even on master difficulty certain abilties are riduclously overpowered & killing dragons, though less tedious than closing Oblivion gates, is the definition of a cake walk, my horse even killed a dragon thats how weak they were!!!, there is no fun in a game that is this simple. That and the story was possibly the most bland & generic of any game this generation. The only good thing I can say about the game is that I did see some good obviously non scripted events occur around me, but again I took no part in these, they just happened near me. This game really is one of the worst gaming experiences I have ever had. It had potential but the "end product" was just an embarassing unfinished mess that realised none of what it could have been imo. While I also didnt enjoy Oblivion, Morrowwind was very decent for its time and Daggerfall had a great many merits. But its fair to say that Skyrim will be the last new Elder Scrolls game I play.

you played the game enough to get a horse and have it fight a dragon and to experience the oversized ps3 save file, and yet you mention every feature of the game as so horrible that the game would have been awful even with 0 glitches. If you hated everything about the game so much you wouldn't have even played it long enough to experience all the complaints you listed let alone the lag glitch that takes a lot of playtime to get to on the ps3. If you did stick through it for that many hours then obviously the experience wasn't as bad as you are making it out to be.



Around the Network

I reviewed earlier so as your topic requests I will not relist my score which was good.

Maybe you should Omit the PS3 version or do it separate. I like 2000cc a lot. So I'm not trying to undermine :).
And I think that would Omit Kylie Dog too.

I know elder scrolls has bugs I've been playing it since daggerfall. I played the PC version, and for me it had an acceptable amount of bugs at launch.

But, if half of the videos/comments aren't some kind of anomaly, about the PS3 version. I'd probably give the PS3 version a pretty low score too. The internet does tend to overreact to everything. But, the state of the game seems to be unnacceptable. And when it gets to that point, the score goes down the toilet for me, regardless of concept. So I understand their point of view.



ishiki said:

I reviewed earlier so as your topic requests I will not relist my score which was good.

Maybe you should Omit the PS3 version or do it separate. I like 2000cc a lot. So I'm not trying to undermine :).
And I think that would Omit Kylie Dog too.

I know elder scrolls has bugs I've been playing it since daggerfall. I played the PC version, and for me it had an acceptable amount of bugs at launch.

But, if half of the videos/comments aren't some kind of anomaly, about the PS3 version. I'd probably give the PS3 version a pretty low score too. The internet does tend to overreact to everything. But, the state of the game seems to be unnacceptable. And when it gets to that point, the score goes down the toilet for me, regardless of concept. So I understand their point of view.

The PS3 version shouldn't be omitted from being rated.

It's still a game.

Did Bethesda "omit" the PS3 version from being released in November with terrible bugs? No. They didn't care about PS3 gamers so why should ratings be different.

On Topic:

6/10:

The game was a definite downgrade from past Elder Scrolls but there's no doubt it has been based on a strong open world. But open worlds alone simply don't cut it for me anymore. The main story isn't engaging at all, the combat is clunky at times, characters pretty much suck.

Just didn't feel anything in Skyrim really, Wtcher 2 was better.



Rob-Ot said:

The PS3 version shouldn't be omitted from being rated.

It's still a game.

Did Bethesda "omit" the PS3 version from being released in November with terrible bugs? No. They didn't care about PS3 gamers so why should ratings be different.

On Topic:

6/10:

The game was a definite downgrade from past Elder Scrolls but there's no doubt it has been based on a strong open world. But open worlds alone simply don't cut it for me anymore. The main story isn't engaging at all, the combat is clunky at times, characters pretty much suck.

Just didn't feel anything in Skyrim really, Wtcher 2 was better.

I guess, my reasoning for this, is, I said separate thread and omitted. I shouldn't have said the omitted part. 

But, Normally ports are quite similar games, people are like the frame rates a bit better, here the colors are a bit better here. but here, its seems more drastic.
it seems that atleast at launch they're 2 separate games because of the bugs.

that said, I don't care that much about it, it was just a suggestion. 



Rob-Ot said:
ishiki said:

I reviewed earlier so as your topic requests I will not relist my score which was good.

Maybe you should Omit the PS3 version or do it separate. I like 2000cc a lot. So I'm not trying to undermine :).
And I think that would Omit Kylie Dog too.

I know elder scrolls has bugs I've been playing it since daggerfall. I played the PC version, and for me it had an acceptable amount of bugs at launch.

But, if half of the videos/comments aren't some kind of anomaly, about the PS3 version. I'd probably give the PS3 version a pretty low score too. The internet does tend to overreact to everything. But, the state of the game seems to be unnacceptable. And when it gets to that point, the score goes down the toilet for me, regardless of concept. So I understand their point of view.

The PS3 version shouldn't be omitted from being rated.

It's still a game.

Did Bethesda "omit" the PS3 version from being released in November with terrible bugs? No. They didn't care about PS3 gamers so why should ratings be different.

On Topic:

6/10:

The game was a definite downgrade from past Elder Scrolls but there's no doubt it has been based on a strong open world. But open worlds alone simply don't cut it for me anymore. The main story isn't engaging at all, the combat is clunky at times, characters pretty much suck.

Just didn't feel anything in Skyrim really, Wtcher 2 was better.

Nevermind



Around the Network

Score 9.0/10

Pros-

Fixes most of what went wrong with Oblivion

It's an Elder Scrolls game

Cons-

Buggy

Dumb AI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHbF9ynGZV0)

Has created one of the worst Meme plagues in histroy...

 

And here a maybe final version

If someone can name every franchise used you can choose one person to get put in!



Former something....

^^Great review TADS12, it's a shame you couldn't finish it.

Anyways I guess it's time for my review.

 

This is one of the few games that I think deserves a 10/10. Sure there are plenty of silly bugs and a frame-rate problem here and there but the time I had with the game was so fun and enjoyable that I wasn't even the least bit bothered by them.

Pros: 

- Massive open world game with more to do then you could ever hope to finish in a lifetime.

- Very good graphics especially considering how big the game was.

- Story was good and the ending spot/music was epic.

- Amazing music

- Addicting leveling system

- Just pure, plain fun.

 

Cons:

Some bugs, pop in, and a slow down in frame-rate once in a big while.



Couple of hours left before I add up the scores.



yo_john117 said:
Couple of hours left before I add up the scores.


Doesn't look too good! :P It might just be one of the lowest ever. 



 

Ok looks like the score was 8.06 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Apo8mkWdFHlEdE54dmktMno0WFBCSndHLWo2YnpuWkE