By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Why isn't there an Xbox handheld?

 

Do you think there should be an xbox handheld device?

Yes 91 30.64%
 
No 142 47.81%
 
I couldnt care less, man-bear-pig 64 21.55%
 
Total:297
DarkDesent666 said:
crissindahouse said:
stfu then....

you have nothing to prove talk out of your ass and that's it. i'm a fanboy? yeah sure i love microsoft so much haha man i will be never a fanboy of a company i think this is one of the most idiotic attitudes to be a fanboy of a company.

 

and i say this because i hate sony right? that's why i have a last of us signature because i hate games for playstation^^ man they even laugh about the master chief in the corner of my sig why should they laugh about him when i'm a microsoft fan? i would never make this kind of sig then.

Then why are you so ravagely defending them? I can't get any sources on the failrate of zune because I keep getting articles on every zune of a certain model breaking at a specific day.

Whatever you are you are the kind of person that ignored the 360 failrate for a year atleast.

i'm not defendig them i just hate people like you talking shit without any proof just because they wish to be right. i have no problem if they fail in producing hardware but you have to prove it and not just "i say zune and original xbox had higher failure rate than the average products in these segments, i can't prove it but it is so"

this is just nonsense



Around the Network
crissindahouse said:
i'm not defendig them i just hate people like you talking shit without any proof just because they wish to be right. i have no problem if they fail in producing hardware but you have to prove it and not just "i say zune and original xbox had higher failure rate than the average products in these segments, i can't prove it but it is so"

this is just nonsense


Of course it's nonsense that's what happens when you paraphrase someone trying to make it into nonsense. This is a freaking forum court level proof just isn't going to happen and you'd dimiss anything else anyways like everyone did with the 360 failrate, so no I'm not going to spend forever digging it up, if your so sure they aren't and believe so much in proof then prove they aren't don't just stand there saying prove it to every statement.  



DarkDesent666 said:
crissindahouse said:
i'm not defendig them i just hate people like you talking shit without any proof just because they wish to be right. i have no problem if they fail in producing hardware but you have to prove it and not just "i say zune and original xbox had higher failure rate than the average products in these segments, i can't prove it but it is so"

this is just nonsense


Of course it's nonsense that's what happens when you paraphrase someone trying to make it into nonsense. This is a freaking forum court level proof just isn't going to happen and you'd dimiss anything else anyways like everyone did with the 360 failrate, so no I'm not going to spend forever digging it up, if your so sure they aren't and believe so much in proof then prove they aren't don't just stand there saying prove it to every statement.  

 wtf is going on with your logic? we all know that the 360 was failing hard the first years i had to buy a new one after 2.5 years as well but you said the same about zune and the first xbox compared to the average failure rate. why the fuck should anyone else prove that this isn't the case? the world works exactly vice versa my friend if you are like this in real life then good night. you talk about the failure rate then you have to prove it.

man i don't even say zune was good or whatever i did never have this thing and did never care about it but since you seem to fail to find sources saying zune had higher failure rate than other products on average with the same functions just means that you just said it because you wish to be right without any clue about the failure rate. why should someone wish to be right with something like that? maybe because you hate microsoft or maybe because you love sony or maybe because you wish to throw something in a forum just because you are you and you like nonsense.

who knows better than you why you said it right? but instead of saying "yes i'm a sony fanboy" or whatever you will still say "you all fail to see how 360 failed" which everyone knows how bad this console was but which has nothing to do with your statement about zune and original xbox.



crissindahouse said:
 wtf is going on with your logic? we all know that the 360 was failing hard the first years i had to buy a new one after 2.5 years as well but you said the same about zune and the first xbox compared to the average failure rate. why the fuck should anyone else prove that this isn't the case? the world works exactly vice versa my friend if you are like this in real life then good night. you talk about the failure rate then you have to prove it.

man i don't even say zune was good or whatever i did never have this thing and did never care about it but since you seem to fail to find sources saying zune had higher failure rate than other products on average with the same functions just means that you just said it because you wish to be right without any clue about the failure rate. why should someone wish to be right with something like that? maybe because you hate microsoft or maybe because you love sony or maybe because you wish to throw something in a forum just because you are you and you like nonsense.

who knows better than you why you said it right? but instead of saying "yes i'm a sony fanboy" or whatever you will still say "you all fail to see how 360 failed" which everyone knows how bad this console was but which has nothing to do with your statement about zune and original xbox.

So you are a hypocritic and just say prove it to every statement then. 



DarkDesent666 said:
crissindahouse said:
 wtf is going on with your logic? we all know that the 360 was failing hard the first years i had to buy a new one after 2.5 years as well but you said the same about zune and the first xbox compared to the average failure rate. why the fuck should anyone else prove that this isn't the case? the world works exactly vice versa my friend if you are like this in real life then good night. you talk about the failure rate then you have to prove it.

man i don't even say zune was good or whatever i did never have this thing and did never care about it but since you seem to fail to find sources saying zune had higher failure rate than other products on average with the same functions just means that you just said it because you wish to be right without any clue about the failure rate. why should someone wish to be right with something like that? maybe because you hate microsoft or maybe because you love sony or maybe because you wish to throw something in a forum just because you are you and you like nonsense.

who knows better than you why you said it right? but instead of saying "yes i'm a sony fanboy" or whatever you will still say "you all fail to see how 360 failed" which everyone knows how bad this console was but which has nothing to do with your statement about zune and original xbox.

So you are a hypocritic and just say prove it to every statement then. 

when i don't know if it's just a lie and i think someone is saying something just because he tries to talk shit i ask for a proof and a forum doesn't change that. most things are logical or i know them so i don't ask but if someone is saying something like you i ask for a proof and this wouldn't be hard to find with the internet. and if it would be true the whole problem would have been solved after my first post to you but it seems that you have no proof so you just said it to talk shit about a company.

why do you say things which are maybe not true or which you have no clue about? i mean, why should someone do that?



Around the Network

It's really not that hard to dig up old articles about the 360's failure rate.

http://consumerist.com/2009/08/xbox-360-failure-rate-is-542-percent-game-informer-finds.html



yinkadare said:
It's really not that hard to dig up old articles about the 360's failure rate.

http://consumerist.com/2009/08/xbox-360-failure-rate-is-542-percent-game-informer-finds.html

We are talking about xbox original and zune. 



yeah that's right like i said everyone knows that the 360 failed hard the first years but i don't like to open this thread 100 times more so let's stop this lol

i'm out^^



yinkadare said:
It's really not that hard to dig up old articles about the 360's failure rate.

http://consumerist.com/2009/08/xbox-360-failure-rate-is-542-percent-game-informer-finds.html

Unfortunately, a survey sent out to the readers of a magazine doesn't qualify for credible facts.  Surveys and polls are known for being incredibly inaccurate due to the fact that people lie.  I would even hedge a guess that GameInformer published the results of their survey hoping Microsoft would come back and refute those findings.  

The closest credible understanding of the failure rate came from a repair facility (I think in Germany), which suggested the failure rate was about 33%.  After the Jasper-based Xbox 360 came out (that's the one before the Xbox 360 S), that dropped to something below 15%.  At the time, that was the last public information they provided about repair rates on the Xbox 360.

Those are still subjective numbers as they relate to one repair service in one part of the world.  Yet, they are actual, factual, numbers. 



I hope you know OP, that 3G is fucking slow as hell. Just thought you ought to know.