DarkDesent666 said:
crissindahouse said:
wtf is going on with your logic? we all know that the 360 was failing hard the first years i had to buy a new one after 2.5 years as well but you said the same about zune and the first xbox compared to the average failure rate. why the fuck should anyone else prove that this isn't the case? the world works exactly vice versa my friend if you are like this in real life then good night. you talk about the failure rate then you have to prove it.
man i don't even say zune was good or whatever i did never have this thing and did never care about it but since you seem to fail to find sources saying zune had higher failure rate than other products on average with the same functions just means that you just said it because you wish to be right without any clue about the failure rate. why should someone wish to be right with something like that? maybe because you hate microsoft or maybe because you love sony or maybe because you wish to throw something in a forum just because you are you and you like nonsense.
who knows better than you why you said it right? but instead of saying "yes i'm a sony fanboy" or whatever you will still say "you all fail to see how 360 failed" which everyone knows how bad this console was but which has nothing to do with your statement about zune and original xbox.
|
So you are a hypocritic and just say prove it to every statement then.
|
when i don't know if it's just a lie and i think someone is saying something just because he tries to talk shit i ask for a proof and a forum doesn't change that. most things are logical or i know them so i don't ask but if someone is saying something like you i ask for a proof and this wouldn't be hard to find with the internet. and if it would be true the whole problem would have been solved after my first post to you but it seems that you have no proof so you just said it to talk shit about a company.
why do you say things which are maybe not true or which you have no clue about? i mean, why should someone do that?
