dsister44 said:
joeorc said:
dsister44 said:
joeorc said:
that's exactly my point.
the very fact one is online one is from a published magazine, the one is in print.
one is right and one is wrong.
that would be like which would be right or which would be wrong something posted online or the official xbox magazine?
|
I guess OPM knows more about Final-Fantasy XIV then Square Enix does -________-
|
no that is posted by GAMERFAQ'S which is "GAMESPOT" last time i checked GAMERFAQ'S OR "gamespot" does not = square or any other GAME DEVELOPMENT PUBLISHER OR GAME COMPANY.
OPM get's it's Info just like Gamefaqs does.
So like I said someone is wrong someone is right.
online info
or
published magazine's info
|
I mean the original link I posted.http://www.vg247.com/2009/08/20/ffxiv-discussions-with-microsoft-holding-up-360-version/
That is from a representative from Square Enix
|
and that was from AUG.
this is from JAN 2010 issue
thing's change first Final Fantasy XIII was to be exclusive to playstation 3 than it went multi-platform
the same could of happened with Final Fantasy XIV it may have went console exclusive to the PS3 it's still going to PC.
but this is the first time that i have seen where it states that Sony computer Ent. is the publisher
an remember that article in aug stated it could does not mean it will.
one thing is this generation has shown development game companies have changed their mind's quite a bit.
look at Quantum Theory it was listed as a PS3 exclusive it's now going to be released also for the xbox360
the thing is xboxlive is the one problem that other game companies have had a problem with before look at Epic game's unreal tournament 3 titan pack expansion pack for the PS3 and PC
I AM BOLO
100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...
ps:
Proud psOne/2/3/p owner. I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.