Kenology said:
theARTIST0017 said:
"In an industry that's certainly had its challenges this year, we like to say that the environment where PlayStation wins is best for this industry. We have a brand that can play on a worldwide basis, young and old, male and female, where our competition tends to be relegated to either select regions or to select consumer audiences. ...We don't have unlimited money, we cater to a more mass market audience. I think we're willing to take a little bit more risk than a competitor like Nintendo is and ultimately we deliver to the masses on a worldwide basis and that's what we've done for the last 15 years." - SCEA boss Jack Tretton
That's what got to me. I don't care that he said Playstation is the best for the industry. That can be argued, but REALLY? Jack you must be on something because the last time I checked Nintendo is where you got a lot of your ideas from. Was dual screens not risky enough for you? Or maybe it was TILT SENSORS! I wonder.
Your thoughts.
Edit: Link- http://www.destructoid.com/sony-winning-is-best-for-the-industry-says-sony-151113.phtml
|
If Nintendo and Microsoft are only appealing to seperate, concentrated sections of the market, and Sony is appealing to the ENTIRE market - wouldn't Sony be #1 and not in 3rd place!?
|
Yes they probably would, because last time I checked, Nintendo was the one that appealed to everyone, young and old, male and female.
And everyone here is saying oh I don't understand. Sony is the one taking more risks blah whatever. Yeah and they lie to people. Their commercials have a PS3 Slim with the slogan "It only does everything!" Yeah! Can it play PS2 games?
