By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Another Wii core game test (Dead Space Extraction)

Khuutra on 05 September 2009
LordTheNightKnight said:
What if this sells better than the HD version? Perhaps not both combined, but at least the PS3 version? That would kind of make it hard to claim these games don't sell on the Wii when the HD versions are selling little or no better. Rail shooter or not.

In that case, EA loses their "See, these games don't sell on the Wii," parachute, and be forced to make more.

It's.... possible.

But it would have to be marketed toward the same crowd who plays Resident Evil on this system.

It could work.



Around the Network
**Slash** on 05 September 2009

lol they put a half arse/half effort game on the wii and say that if it doesnt sell millions, they drop mature /hardcore games on the wii?
how about they put a railshooter on 360/PS3 and see if it sells there lol

man those guys are hyprocritical idiots



   

Improvements are caused by people who complain

LordTheNightKnight on 05 September 2009
Khuutra said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
What if this sells better than the HD version? Perhaps not both combined, but at least the PS3 version? That would kind of make it hard to claim these games don't sell on the Wii when the HD versions are selling little or no better. Rail shooter or not.

In that case, EA loses their "See, these games don't sell on the Wii," parachute, and be forced to make more.

It's.... possible.

But it would have to be marketed toward the same crowd who plays Resident Evil on this system.

It could work.

There is also another rail shooter on the Wii that outsold either version of Dead Space.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

arsenal009 on 05 September 2009
LordTheNightKnight said:
What if this sells better than the HD version? Perhaps not both combined, but at least the PS3 version? That would kind of make it hard to claim these games don't sell on the Wii when the HD versions are selling little or no better. Rail shooter or not.

In that case, EA loses their "See, these games don't sell on the Wii," parachute, and be forced to make more.

If it sells better than the HD versions then they would just make another rail shooter for the Wii.



Khuutra on 05 September 2009
LordTheNightKnight said:
Khuutra said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
What if this sells better than the HD version? Perhaps not both combined, but at least the PS3 version? That would kind of make it hard to claim these games don't sell on the Wii when the HD versions are selling little or no better. Rail shooter or not.

In that case, EA loses their "See, these games don't sell on the Wii," parachute, and be forced to make more.

It's.... possible.

But it would have to be marketed toward the same crowd who plays Resident Evil on this system.

It could work.

There is also another rail shooter on the Wii that outsold either version of Dead Space.

I meant the RE4 players, since Dead Space is apparently scary as Hell.



Around the Network
LordTheNightKnight on 05 September 2009
arsenal009 said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
What if this sells better than the HD version? Perhaps not both combined, but at least the PS3 version? That would kind of make it hard to claim these games don't sell on the Wii when the HD versions are selling little or no better. Rail shooter or not.

In that case, EA loses their "See, these games don't sell on the Wii," parachute, and be forced to make more.

If it sells better than the HD versions then they would just make another rail shooter for the Wii.

So the hell what? This doesn't mean they won't make other games as well. And I am really sick of this "rail shooter = bad" notion. It's just another bs standard.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

hunter_alien on 05 September 2009

It looks great and IMO it will sell at least en-par with HotD:O. That wont be huge ammount, but it will be IMO enough to cover the cost of development.

This wont be the last M rated project from EA for the WIi IMO



Vote the Mayor for Mayor!

arsenal009 on 05 September 2009
LordTheNightKnight said:
arsenal009 said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
What if this sells better than the HD version? Perhaps not both combined, but at least the PS3 version? That would kind of make it hard to claim these games don't sell on the Wii when the HD versions are selling little or no better. Rail shooter or not.

In that case, EA loses their "See, these games don't sell on the Wii," parachute, and be forced to make more.

If it sells better than the HD versions then they would just make another rail shooter for the Wii.

So the hell what? This doesn't mean they won't make other games as well. And I am really sick of this "rail shooter = bad" notion. It's just another bs standard.

Who said anything about rail shooter = bad?  I own target terror & ghost squad & will eventually get House of the Dead.  Also, give me Star Fox Wii over Zelda Wii or Galaxy 2 anyday.

I'm just saying I think that's what EA will do.



LordTheNightKnight on 05 September 2009
arsenal009 said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
arsenal009 said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
What if this sells better than the HD version? Perhaps not both combined, but at least the PS3 version? That would kind of make it hard to claim these games don't sell on the Wii when the HD versions are selling little or no better. Rail shooter or not.

In that case, EA loses their "See, these games don't sell on the Wii," parachute, and be forced to make more.

If it sells better than the HD versions then they would just make another rail shooter for the Wii.

So the hell what? This doesn't mean they won't make other games as well. And I am really sick of this "rail shooter = bad" notion. It's just another bs standard.

Who said anything about rail shooter = bad?  I own target terror & ghost squad & will eventually get House of the Dead.  Also, give me Star Fox Wii over Zelda Wii or Galaxy 2 anyday.

I'm just saying I think that's what EA will do.

Exccuse me. The context of the comment was like the others here claiming such a thing. So I couldn't tell you don't mean that. Thank you for clarifying.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

arsenal009 on 05 September 2009
LordTheNightKnight said:
arsenal009 said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
arsenal009 said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
What if this sells better than the HD version? Perhaps not both combined, but at least the PS3 version? That would kind of make it hard to claim these games don't sell on the Wii when the HD versions are selling little or no better. Rail shooter or not.

In that case, EA loses their "See, these games don't sell on the Wii," parachute, and be forced to make more.

If it sells better than the HD versions then they would just make another rail shooter for the Wii.

So the hell what? This doesn't mean they won't make other games as well. And I am really sick of this "rail shooter = bad" notion. It's just another bs standard.

Who said anything about rail shooter = bad?  I own target terror & ghost squad & will eventually get House of the Dead.  Also, give me Star Fox Wii over Zelda Wii or Galaxy 2 anyday.

I'm just saying I think that's what EA will do.

Exccuse me. The context of the comment was like the others here claiming such a thing. So I couldn't tell you don't mean that. Thank you for clarifying.

I'm guessing most of those ppl complaining never even play rail shooters.  Reminds me of this quote from a game I just beat  XD