maykissthebride said:
ClaudeLv250 said:
Wii is hardly in the same position as Atari, mostly because it has and is getting worthwhile releases this year and because Nintendo is not preparing to fart out their own version of E.T. Anyone who thinks they are even remotely in the same boat is out of touch with reality.
Also I doubt games like Petz are hurting the Wii as a brand when those same games can be found on practically every platform on the market. If anything they're "hurting" the developers making millions off the people that continue to buy them.
|
your argument is as coherent as "It isnt, because i dont want it to!"
Nope, they´re hurting the wii brand, yes.
Cause the PS3 and Xbox have their own casual crappy games, sure.
But the wii has 10x more.
When the consumer buy these games and realize they suck, that´s dissapointment.
When the consumer buy these games for the second time, that´s hate. Hate for the brand.
"Stupid consumer! He should buy Zack and Wiki instead!"
How?
How the regular people can see the difference, by box art alone?
You have a full shelf of games ahead of you. All featuring colored boxes and fancy names. How can you tell which one is the best?
"The stupid consumer should look up at the internet and find out which one are good games!!!"
Yeah, but that´s a bold move! That´s a research job that the regular consumer dont belive he/she should have. At least, not for videogames.
Videogames are supposed to be just chose, play, have fun/keep your kids quiet.
Not a trouble on itself.
We, forum posters, blog readers, we have on us that our hobby is to play games and read about em. We know the stuff, in and out. But the new market dont know anything. And dont want to get a degree in gaming just to play.
Every game represents your console brand. If the vast marjority of these games gives the player a bad impression, you are in trouble.
|
