SNES......... Better games and Nintendo are a far better 1st party developer.
Bottom line________________________
SNES......... Better games and Nintendo are a far better 1st party developer.
Bottom line________________________
Why do i dislike sony? Google search "playstation prototype
nuff said there
Carl2291 said:
But they were around... And does it really matter how many were actually developed by Sony, or how many were Sony IPs? They still appeared on Playstation, and this is meant to be what you think is the better console, Snes or Playstation. I gave my reasons for why i think Playstation. |
kind of. lets just say for the sake of argument that playstation is the better console. its better because of a bunch of games that they didnt create? they just put out a console and let everybody and their grandma develop for it.
i dunno, nintendo always seems to do more for the industry. theyre a very very respectable company.
angrypoolman said:
kind of. lets just say for the sake of argument that playstation is the better console. its better because of a bunch of games that they didnt create? they just put out a console and let everybody and their grandma develop for it. i dunno, nintendo always seems to do more for the industry. theyre a very very respectable company. |
That wa sony's plan. And it worked. They wiped the floor with nintendo 2 generations in a row.
So why shouldn't they get credit for coming into the business and making it easy for developers to make games for them?
angrypoolman said:
kind of. lets just say for the sake of argument that playstation is the better console. its better because of a bunch of games that they didnt create? they just put out a console and let everybody and their grandma develop for it. i dunno, nintendo always seems to do more for the industry. theyre a very very respectable company. |
I see what you are saying, but wasnt that Sony's plan with the Playstation? And it certainly worked for them.
I 100% agree with you about Ninty doing the most for the industry, but Sony with the Playstation brought gaming to the mainstream, and even more so with Playstation 2.
![]()
Carl2291 said:
I see what you are saying, but wasnt that Sony's plan with the Playstation? And it certainly worked for them. I 100% agree with you about Ninty doing the most for the industry, but Sony with the Playstation brought gaming to the mainstream, and even more so with Playstation 2. |
Sony never made video games mainstream. All they did is increase the Age of the people who played games.
It indroduce Adults and older people. The fact that it did that is false. It basically took nintendo's 1st party
make aldults games and bang their you have it. Also it di expand it alot though it shrunk the population of
kids that played it. Which is why the N64 still sold great. and the the GC sold a third less. If it did bring mainstream
than you will see alot of people know about this game or that game like the movie industry.

Carl2291 said:
But they were around... And does it really matter how many were actually developed by Sony, or how many were Sony IPs? They still appeared on Playstation, and this is meant to be what you think is the better console, Snes or Playstation. I gave my reasons for why i think Playstation. |
Yeah it does matter. If your comparing too consoles with incredible game libraries and one console has excellent first and third party games and the other has only excellent third party titles then the winner is the console with both. If the console maker with great first party content didn't exist gamers would have missed out on top notch games. If the third party dependent platform didn't exist gamers would have been playing those very same games on a different platform.
