By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Ghostbusters LEADs on PS3 - But graphically superior on 360.

International Douche on 15 June 2009
markers said:
International Douche said:
Skeeuk said:
douche nice alt account.

some differences there definatly. the missing effects that arnt on ps3 version ie. the smoulders god knows why its not in.

i dont think anyone will say one looks better than other. the devs did say if it was exclusive they could have packed much more on screen with ps3 only, so my only guess is that they didnt lead completly on ps3 and had to complete game with dvd in mind.


What has DVD got to do with it, stick to the topic.

360 uses dvd's, so dvd has everything to do with this. ps3 could of been lead platform but that doesnt mean they didnt lead on the ps3 with the 360 disc limit in mind.


Is he suggesting the DVD capacity was a limit for the Ghostbusters video game. I do wish people wouldn't just imply things in this hypothetical tone without being explicit. Simply with the aim sewing a seed of doubt in people's minds that it may have played a part. Zero proof = 100% speculation.



Around the Network
markers on 15 June 2009
International Douche said:
markers said:
International Douche said:
Skeeuk said:
douche nice alt account.

some differences there definatly. the missing effects that arnt on ps3 version ie. the smoulders god knows why its not in.

i dont think anyone will say one looks better than other. the devs did say if it was exclusive they could have packed much more on screen with ps3 only, so my only guess is that they didnt lead completly on ps3 and had to complete game with dvd in mind.


What has DVD got to do with it, stick to the topic.

360 uses dvd's, so dvd has everything to do with this. ps3 could of been lead platform but that doesnt mean they didnt lead on the ps3 with the 360 disc limit in mind.


Is he suggesting the DVD capacity was a limit for the Ghostbusters video game. I do wish people wouldn't just imply things in this hypothetical tone without being explicit. Simply with the aim sewing a seed of doubt in people's minds that it may have played a part. Zero proof = 100% speculation.

his last line "so my only guess is that they didnt lead completly on ps3 and had to complete game with dvd in mind" is as clear cut as it gets.



monlosez on 15 June 2009

But Killzone 2 looks everything better than this.



Skeeuk on 15 June 2009

ive just read the lensoftruth article and it shows that 360 version looks better, identicle game but looks better on 360.

reading the lens article, i dont think that devs leaded on ps3 all the way or mabey at all, even though at beging devs did say they were leading on ps3.



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

richardhutnik on 15 June 2009
CGI-Quality said:
richardhutnik said:
One thing that can happen is a game developed later ends up working with an improved engine, and graphics are tweaked and updated and improved. I believe Dirt on the PS3 is supposed to be an upgrade over Dirt on the 360, for example. In the case of Virtua Fighter on the 360, its graphics were updated over the PS3 version. Bioshock saw spots also where that is similar. Same with Oblivion regarding the PS3 vs the 360 version.

The PS3 and 360 are in the same CLASS graphically. Why people expect there not to have this happen is absurd.

They're similar, but not in the same class. The things that can be/can't be achieved on each still exist. For instance, AA and texture mapping rely heavily on the GPU and RAM. This is why many 360 multiplats have an advantage on their PS3 counterparts. The 360's GPU is better for AA (anti-aliasing) and the way it shares it's RAM with the CPU and GPU usually provide sharper results in the texture mapping area.

However, the PS3 can do things with physics and animation that can't be achieved on the 360. So in a sense, they're similar, but not the same.

Same class is NOT the same as identical.  The PS3 and 360 have advantages over one another in one area or another.  Because they are in the same class (the Wii is NOT), the multiport titles end up nearly identical to one aother.  Class her refers to quality, not list of features.



Around the Network
Xbot on 15 June 2009

no surpise



leo-j on 15 June 2009

The game doesnt lead on ps3.. if it did there wouldnt be an install to begin with



 

mM
leo-j on 15 June 2009

wait why does IGN have the 360 version( IGN UK?)? That version isnt releasing in Europe



 

mM
Ajescent on 15 June 2009

Review copy...?



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

Lord Flashheart on 15 June 2009

the lensoftruth comparison.
http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=10974



Official member of the Xbox 360 Squad