Does that includes me?

Some of those points were plan off. Let's begin....

1. I will agree here, but in terms of hard numbers, he is correct. The Wii is selling better, has more titles, and will have a longer life. Still a fanboy
2. No one harolded Halo Wars are the second coming of the 360. They did for KZ2 and the PS3. Halo 3, on the other hand, has beaten every other PS3 game.
3. "Better" is so subjective that I'm not even going to try talking about it.
4. I hit Ctrl+F and searched for the word "graphic" I was used only three times on the entire site. Everytime he did, though, he was parroting Malstrom saying how games are not about cinematics the two copnsoles are casualized PCs.
5. I'll agree here
6. OK, this is the worst part. He never said the word "six-hundred" on his blog. Not once. You shouldn't critizes someone if you are going to lie or use wrong information. Point six is pethetic.
7. While, yes, some of these points were off, most of them were true. Yes, the system is too expensive. Yes, Sony is arrogent. Yes, the PS3 lacks a strong library (remember kids: software pushes hardware. The system wouldn't be in last place if it had a strong library of games people want). Yes, the killer-apps came too late (and were also weaker then those on the Wii and 360).
8. I probably wouldn't play Party babies (at least he spelled it right, unlike yourself). However, he did play it, and he likes it. If you got mad at me for saying the PS3 doesn't have a good library and will post a list of games, then your a hypocrit.

Here is your problem guys. You are all looking at this backwards.

You say "He is a fanboy, he must be wrong." This is just ad homenin. In fact, if you read though the site, a good portion of his imformation is correct and he has correctly identified things PS3 fans keep denying. Now, I say "He is wrong becuase he is a fan boy." Not only did I not attack the messanger, but I was able to indetify a problem. By looking this way, I did not cloud my judgement (unlike the rest of you). In fact, becuase of this, I say he had some good points and some strong arguments. No one here tried to challange the arguments. They just called him an idiot.

Is he Malstrom? Hell no. Is he a fanboy? Yes. Is he wrong? No.

Yes. People bouth the Wii for Wii Sports.

One of the Nintendo exects. said it, but the purpose of the Wii Remote was to breath new life into games. Notice, with Nintendo, that there is always a major focus on games. The only time Nintendo did not focus on the software was when the remote was shown at TGS 05, but the lauch trailer still showed people using the controller to play ambigious games.

Your claim is purposterous. Your saying "The Wii Remote sold the Wii." There is good reason why you would say that. The first is that you are niave and beleive the hardware is why people buy systems, which is wrong. The other, is the beleife that if the 360 or PS3 get a controller, they can beat the Wii.

If Nintendo release the Wii and the remote, but there was no good game to buy on it, would people have bought it. It didn't work for the 360 or PS3. For the NES, people had to have Super Mario bros. For the gameboy, people had to have  Tetris and later, Pokemon. For the Genesis, people had to have Sonic the Hedgehog. For the N64, people had to have Super Mario 64. For the DS, people had to have Brain Age and Nintendog. Despite it's weaker sales, the XBox was sold just for Halo 2. The PS1 probalby sold for Final Fantasy and Grand Theft Auto. The PS3's problem was it didn't have software people wanted. 

No one would want a Wii Remote for the sake of having one. Why would they. It would be useless. They wanted Wii Sports. The game was a hit. It was everywhere. Everyone loved playing with the remote (key word there). The system only carried it's sucess. Wii Fit was also a big hit and people had to have Wii Fit, so, concequently, they had to have a Wii.

1.Ok, ''the wii is selling better'' arument is REALLY REALLY old. You people are using it every time when you try to win an argument. Wii sports sold better than Madworld, does that means Wii sports are better?

2.Well if almost new IP outsold the game with name HALO in it, ITS NOT a flop.

3.Try researching a bit about those games

4.That togehter with saying Wii is only console worth of owning because HD consoles are ''crippeld PCs'' And plus, he says that bulding PCs which can outperform 360 and even PS3 is CHEAP.

6.''Those are all valid issues of course, a $500 PS3 can't run a game better than a $200 360'' Hmm... weird. Sony hater still think the price is 500$-600$

7.Ok, this is the worst one.

1.For SOME people is, yes.

2.Sony's  arrogance pretty much ended when Ken Kuturagi left.

3.WHAT THE FUCK??? Almost every gaming web site agreed PS3 had strongest line up in 2008 and it probably has best line up in 2009. What does wii have??  Wii sports resort which  is re-make of the 3-year old game and...uhm... 360 has HALO ODST which is just a DLC. Anyway, saying which console has best libary is TOTALY based on your opinnion and nothing else.

 8. The game is CALLED PARTY BABYZ,so i DIDNT spelled it wrong

Dunno, I can't be bothered to read all the bashing going on here, it's just that some people here seem to get worked up over nothing...

Well, when someone acts like his/hers opinnions are facts i pretty much get pissed. And WSR and Conduit is the only BIG ( i mean really big) game sto come out for Wii in 2009. Maybe nintendo will show us more on E3.

Oh dear God.

Ninja Blade is shovelware. From Software is well know for low budget, low quality games (to be fair I enjoyed Kuon, but it was far from a great game). You must really be desperate to use that Gamepro review like it is a opinion shared among a lot of people. It was the only 100% review that this shitty game got. It has a metacritic average of 68, more than half of the reviews are below 75. Why don`t you tell this guy here http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=211632 how great the game is?

There is no point in arguing with someone that can`t understand a concept as simple as "cheap". If you look at the trafic in the streets you will see that they did not bother to render the cars, they are just red lights (easy to do in stage 2 and some cutscenes). Would you call this cheap? On rails shooting parts and QTE are not what I would call expensive assets either. Ninja Blade is full of bugs, like 1) getting stuck in the scenario, 2) enemies attacking thru walls, 3) floating enemies, 4) the well know glitch that screws up your results screen and make it (almost) impossible to get some clothes and achievements. The game last stages 7,8 and 9 are made with pieces of the earlier stages (stage 2 in particular). Some of the bosses are rematches (without a intro). Gametrailers mocked it saying that the game is not ashamed of it and call the achievement for completing mission 7 "deja vu". The graphics are ok at best outside cutscenes and several textures look very poor (rocks, debris).

100 bucks says that you would not take a avatar/sign bet that I have played and finished NB.

Also, I think that the marketing budget for Wii Fit alone may be bigger than Ninja Blade budget (and several other From Software games). It may be a shock for you, but expensive does not mean good looking game. Wii Fit had a much longer development cycle than NB, just the research to make the balance board must be more than expensive than NB. I bet Nintendo also did extensive "tests" with potential consumers, that could delay or bring up the costs of the overall product. Some people take their time improving the gameplay and making sure that game run well, others just add QTE on a buggy game and call it a day. As for Wii Music, I have no idea about costs, research or development cycle so I will not make any comments.

As for the GC vs Wii comment,  It is not like you would understand it (even with I explained using colorful drawings and made puppet show). I say you should e-mail Malstrom.