GranTurismo said: Fuzzmosis said: Just do a sum of all assumptions here: A) Only 10% of Wii owners did not own a system last gen B) 85% of Wii owners (Discounting the previous 10) owned a Game Cube C) GC Owners are Fast Adaptors D) Once all GC owners have adapted, sales with go down to 25%.
So, in essence, assuming this rate of sales continues, after the next year and a half when all game cube owners have adopted the Wii, sales will go down to about 2.5 million/year. This is your argument, rephrased and without a smile and sign saying "Hit me, I want attention". |
The 25% is what i think it is selling right now to non GC owners, thats not to say that number won't go higher. Lets all asume Nintendo has a max fan base of the original NES, about 85mil. Add the 10% non gamers to that and you have 93.5mil wii's going to be sold. I just think right now that 75% of all wii sales are Gc owners. It will just take time for the rest of the Nintendo fanbase to come back home. |
This is your mistake. There is no such thing as a fanbase. I'll go ahead and save anyone else the trouble of responding to this topic of yours.
You assume 85% of Wii owners owned Gamecubes. However, other than just the sales evidence which is so strongly against that it's ridiculous, we have a poll taken on this very site. Enjoy: http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?start=0&id=4541
Go ahead and read through the first page of that post. It's pretty clear very quickly that even on this site most Wii owners never had a Gamecube. Although he didn't post here, even the biggest fanboy of all, Soriku, didn't own a Gamecube. Even more entertaining, the aint-Soriku, Leo-j, owned a Gamecube but no Wii. So you see, the so called "Nintendo fanboys" aren't really Nintendo fanboys, they are just moving with the times.
The issue is you assume there is a such thing as a Nintendo fanbase. There may be 10 million gamers in the world who are actually loyal to a company. Everyone else? They just buy whatever they feel like buying each generation. I'll tell you an industry secret: Only three things determine which system sells the best each generation. Price, quantity of games, and mass media recognition.
Why is this? Well that's because we don't matter. By we, I mean all of us 10 million or so gamers who actually get on the internet and look up game information. We mean nothing. The vast majority of gamers are average people who walk into a game store and go straight to whatever has the most games. Or they go buy whatever has the biggest advertisement, or the best advertisement. Or they buy that thing they heard about on TV. How about that system Stephen Colbert picked up? Oh yeah, it was the Wii.
The Wii is the cheapest, the Wii has the most games, and the Wii has the best mass market advertising. That's all that matters in the end. That's what every winning console has had. The Gamecube was slightly cheaper than the PS2 but had so many fewer games that it didn't matter. It doesn't matter if they have the best games of the generation. The two highest rated games of last generation were on the Gamecube (Metroid Prime and Resident Evil 4). Did that mean anything? No. It never does.
To summarize: core gamers have no effect whatsoever on the winning console in any given generation, including this one. I've been gaming for 20 years GranTurismo. I have owned every major gaming console ever made up to this generation, and I will stake my tens of thousands of dollars worth of video games and video game systems on this statement: Nothing will outsell the Wii this generation, with the possible exception of the DS.