Namco JRPG characters are so uninteresting,at least this one will be interesting to look at.
Namco JRPG characters are so uninteresting,at least this one will be interesting to look at.
No underboob for Soriku.
And it looks like they are trying to keep their 'A' rating.
| Kasz216 said: Oh no... instead of wearing half a bra as a top she's wearing a whole bra! |
I wish there was more of this... -_-'


lolita said:
I wish there was more of this... -_-' |
I know what you mean. I shake my head in disgust when I see how, for example, Sophitia in Soul Calibur has gradually, each game, lost clothing.
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
I know what you mean. I shake my head in disgust when I see how, for example, Sophitia in Soul Calibur has gradually, each game, lost clothing. |
Quit sucking up :P I luvs me Sophia..... and i believe there on the right track....
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
I know what you mean. I shake my head in disgust when I see how, for example, Sophitia in Soul Calibur has gradually, each game, lost clothing. |
You can say the same thing about Ivy and some of the girls in DOA. Makes you wonder how they fight with those things
The clothing loss is part of the sequel/upgrade process, of course! Why buy the next DoA, SC, etc. if the character's are wearing more clothing, and not less?
In other words... if the demographics buying the games wanted the character's to be different looking... why did they purchase the game in the first place again? Why would the game developer/publisher change the formula again? They like to gamble?
I think its safe to argue that JRPGs do not depend on scantily-clad female characters to sell copies, but that's not necessarily true in other genres, where the one of the only major differences between competing products is the look of the characters.
However, if you have a popular JRPG series will a lot of barely dressed Amazonian warrior ladies (or whatever)... how smart would it be to try and rewrite the IP with Amazonian warrior ladies wearing baggy sweatshirts and baggy pants? Why not just start a new IP that doesn't depend on said premise, rather than change (and potentially upset the userbase of) the old one?
Better yet, how about putting some money into resolving the ridiculous repression in our society that causes these outrageous desires to see what are, in reality, completely non-sexual infant-feeding devices? Maybe stop some children from getting autism, ADD, ADHD, and assorted auto-immune disorders, from the lack of defensive mechanisms present in breastmilk, but not in formula?
Attack the source of the problem, not the symptoms.
^Then why did you waste my time making think up a sarcastic response?
[sarcasm btw]