fuck how can i top that without going NSFW

Bow to the king!!!!!

On the issue of drives in Consoles:
I will say what I have said all along, begininng with SEGACD, CD-i vs. Playstation days.

I want a videogame system to play videogames. If i want a movie/mp3/music/karaoke device I will buy one to do that, that is intended to do just that. If I want a videogame system I would prefer a game system that does just that, play videogames.

Now, I admit that it is cool that the 360 can play DvDs as well, so I can move my old DVD player to an older TV. Its sweet to have the mp3 functionality. So if a system can do it, without hindering the production/value of the console, than go for it and thats sweet. but If its gonna cost me another $100 up front, because that was a cost difference that the company made in choice, then I don't want it. You see what I'm saying?
See this is an inherent problem with the SONY Playstation machines. The PS is and always has been a medium/ or measure/conduit whatever the word should be, of essentially selling their drives. They were contraced for original PS for CD drives. They made the PS2 basically a PS1 with a DVD drive, Now its Blu-Ray. They do it to help the market and test their drives. So... yeah I look at Sony as a Drive with a game system added on, as opposed to a "pure" game system. THAT is something I am not interested in.


On the subject of Blu Rays specifically.

So far its eF em. I think there are about 4 movies in my top 50 on Blu-Ray and all of them have less special Features than my DVDs (SE) which are obviusly cheaper anyho. So no its not worth it for me to change Libraries. It is also more probable than before that a new medium could come out before it rises to the top making it obsolete.

Honestly, don't care.  I guess if it a) didn't increase the price and b) didn't make the drive slow (the PS3s BluRay drive is considerably slower than the Xbox's DVD drive) I wouldn't mind, sure, it's a bonus - but it's not worth it if it cost more or makes the console slower - largely because BluRay is a 'fad' of sorts, no matter what popularity it gains in the next couple years, it is going to be replaced by downloads and streaming - this is just inevitable.  By next-gen, BluRay will already be dead as a movie format - though to be fair/honest it may well live on as a large-capacity optical disc format for data, unless something else comes along ...

^ Right on! thats what I'm talking about!

yes i would like a blu ray player attachment, also web browser on the next xbox.

i mean why not? of course it should be implemented.

What reason is there for Blu Ray in a 360? Logically there is no positive answer that you can accept. Blu Ray in no way shape or form is the future. It's just an update on current DVD. True power in the latter is something that makes the former obsolete, Savvy? This is why DVD won the war against VHS. Just watch as Blu Ray becomes yesterdays news next gen. It will be that quick and you will wonder how and why when you put so much faith in it. People are only psychologically behind Blu Ray because Sony was behind forcing it into the mass market. HD-DVD got the sales it deserved, because it didn't prove normal DVD's obsolete. Next gen Sony will unveil that they've found another format that is more powerful than Blu Ray so they can cash in on it. Look at the trend friend starting from the PS1 era to now and you'll get my point.

Lol if Microsoft did put blu-ray into their consoles they would have to pay Sony for the blu-ray.