Did you report Hus's post Solidar?

That's funny, because the biggest argument of PS3 owners in support of Blu-ray is that it will increase game length.  Perhaps you should pay a bit more attention to your own side's stance, or at least find another way to justify blu-ray if it won't be used to increase the length of the gaming experience.  Heavenly Sword for example claims to have 10GB of audio in their 7 hour game.  Of course, you could compress all that down to small enough to fit on a DVD-9 along with a full game experience and lose next to none of that quality.  Is that what we are going to do with Blu-ray?  Just stop compressing things to make miniscule improvements in quality?

Not only that, but I have to ask, who the hell would pay $600 for something they are only going to use for 10 hours of the month, much less another $60 for a game that's only 6 hours long? Not only that, but if you take the time to come and post on a gaming site something tells me you have a lot more time than you are pretending to have.  Certainly you are the only person I have ever met who thinks it's a good idea to have less value in a game for the cost.  Perhaps you picked the wrong system, as most PS3 owners like to consider their game system to be one designed for core gamers.  

You want to talk about luxury?  I work 30 hours a week and go to college another 12 hours a week.  I pay rent, I pay for food, and I pay college loans all at the same time.  I am not going to spend my hard earned money on a game system I'm only going to use for 10 hours a month.  I am certainly not going to spend $60 on a video game that will only deliver 7 hours of entertainment.  Apparently all your responsibilities that you claim to have taught you that it's a good idea to waste thousands of dollars on things you hardly use.

Some noob out of nowhere attacks Hus? Excuse me, but Hus came on here and made a childish, cuss-filled post bashing the original poster. The fact that you use the word noob shows me that you are an uneducated teen-ager. Are you referring to my amount of posts when you say that? I never knew you had to have no life and have 10000000 posts before you could make an opinion.

The PS3 does not need to compete with the Wii to survive .The Wii as a system is just far to different and unique to get all the games. The PS3 only needs to succeed against the 360 and produce decent sales for the games it has coming up to place it's foot down.

I think that when the big games for the PS3 come out, you will see the 360 lead over the PS3 greatly decrease. The Wii does not enter into this equation, nor does it need to.

Enjoy the first day, Solidar, 'cause if you keep attacking people like you have been it could also be your last.

And the fact of the matter is, your gaming experience = shit. Really, if you had ECONOMIC experience you'd be aware of the fact that thanks to inflation the early Atari systems actually launched at a higher price. SOME people may not be aware of the difference that has on the pocketbook, but I can assure you most people look at the cost of gas and the cost of the PS3 and realize the cost of gaming isn't rising that fast at all.

Nintendo is really the only company in the business that thinks $200 is a good price. Even retailers have told them they are asking for way too little. That's economics for you, though. And clearly the retailers were correct, since the thing has stayed sold out at $250 and almost certainly would have at $300.

So whats you problem with the post, i see

"Sony's main focus at present remains firmly on the PS2 and the PSP"

I agree with him, thats a pretty dumb commnent.

Just becasue you or others dont that does not mean you should cry ban him. What pro sony opinion is not alowed o here just come out and say it.

@ Solidar

Of course it doesn't.  Everyone and their brother keeps talking about how the Wii has expanded the market to previous non-gamers.  That means the people who would have bought a PS3 before have, to a likely sizable degree, not picked up the Wii in place of the PS3.  Some may have grabbed it as an interim console while they wait for the PS3 price to come down, but the Wii isn't exactly stealing Sony's main consumer away.

 I whole heartedly agree, and will probably get attacked for it even possibly banned.

 The article has good points but the whole PS brand is not about gaming vibe is dumb, go though the list of Sony developers and just about all of them are hard at work on PS3 software.

Of course Hus didn't start it, but he sure as hell continued it. Pro-sony opinion is allowed but he insulted others and he has a flame record and should be banned for flaming in many topics. He has flamed numerous times. Solidar should have a warning considering he has not been on this site for very long. But Hus has been flaming forever and should be banned now.