Maybe you should read my post further up and mrstickballs post. I see your argument against day 1 DLC (which i've never even seen) but what is your opinion on DLC that comes out 6 months or a year after release?

It must feel better when the DLC is exclusive so you can come to vgc to tell Rock_on, "hey, I got DLC and you didn't...take that!"

I got his point. Some DLC (think GTA:L&D, Valkyria chronicles Selvaria dlc) were obviously made after the game's completion and thats fine. But when you have something like Scamco's Star wars character gaffe, it's a cause for concern. They expected me to pay an extra $4.99 to play as Yoda who was obviously already on the disc. I had to vote a hell no with my wallet and I suggest many of you who feel the same should do the same.

In the case of RE5, if capcom is locking parts of the game to sell as dlc, I don't think you should be too happy about it unless games are not expensive enough for you. In my case, I ceased to care about RE when it became another shooter so I couldn't care less.

My thoughts exactly. Content already on the disc sold as DLC also sucks.

will be interested too see what this is all about.

Now you're just placing words in my mouth and using it to bash.

MS and Sony are both in it for the money, that's something that everyone will acknowledge.

Sony has not been doing the MS-tactic of buying DLC or getting an agreement for this (let's admit it, money has to be given for a company usually to go DLC without making it multiplat), since we all know they are in a weak financial state.  They cannot spend the money, even though they can guess that it'll bring in more money.

MS can do this because they have deeper pockets and their higher sales + higher income stream (live and such) gives them an easier chance to earn back the money.

That the fans benefit from this, is a side effect, which is something they can market and something they can say, but which holds little to no reality for them.  That the fans are happy, creates an easier environment to get money out of them.

It's really pathetic and weak to turn those words into "yeah, Sony is the one who doesn't care about their fans, because they give them an half-assed experience".

First it was that MS gave the fans even more, now it's that sony isn't willing to give their fans the complete experience.
Pathetic from your side, mrstickball.


Let's turn it around:  Sony cares about their fans, since they have a massive first and second party developer crew, churning out massive games each year.  MS doesn't care about their fans since they scratch those developers out of their company.  Foo-ey on MS.   Also stupid statement, also bolony.

prolly a special wallpaper for 120 MS Points.

Totally agree, If sony spent some cash rather than ripping their fans off maybe the PS3 would start getting extra content too.

The 360 is getting exclusive content for almost all new multiplatform games now, fallout 3, gta4, tomb raider, RE5, street fighter 4, the list goes on, the only people complaining are sony fanboys lmao

I'm not trying to put words in your mouth. Just argue the point for Sony. If you are getting upset at what MS is doing (which is why you've responded negatively to what MS is doing - getting exclusive DLC), then why not argue the point that MS is choosing to give their players a better experience? It's not unlikely that Sony could contract Capcom out to get their own exclusive scenarios in DLC for Resident Evil 5, but are choosing, either by intention or lack of money, not to.

Does Sony care about their fans? Their track record is pretty bad this gen. First they force them to adopt to a next-gen optical format that adds $200 to the system price, then they become so smug as to give them a horrible software lineup for the first 16 months of the console's life, then they remove critical features like Backwards Compatability from every device. That's not a lot of fanservice, is it?

Sony has better studios than MS. Problem is there have been 3 decent IPs to come out as 1st party exclusives - Resistance 1/2, Motorstorm, and LittleBigPlanet. That's really not a lot of 1st party titles to boast about...Is it? I mean, maybe if you were used to what the Sega Saturn got in the way of exclusives, you'll be fine with it, but the average gamer that adopted the PS1/2 en-mass the past 2 generations didn't enjoy it. Which is probably why few have chosen to adopt the big black whale-esque box called the Playstation 3.

Thats what it is looking like.