Regardless of bias; the "journalist" that wrote the bottom piece can't write for shit. How do these people get these jobs? Being a moron also helps, it seems.

Is he really a journalist? As far as I can see the article called "stop overhyping KZ2" was written by Dan Landis, while that post which is quoted there was written by a John Landis (with a different avatar).

EDIT - btw, look at this post:

why do you have to bring the wii into this thread?

Anyway, who cares if there is hate against the Ps3 or its game. That's what happen when you were onced dominant and now suffering, people who have always wanted to bash you, take their shots. But, dont take it so seriously. It's part of the Business.

As an example of what real hate from the media looks like... Not this overreaction based on a blog comment which was apparently not even written by a journalist.

No, the media isn't biased against the PS3, that is silly.

And no, you don't know better than everyone else when it comes to spending money. Your platform choice reflects on you very little as a person. That is even sillier.

The one who wrote the bottom one and the top one are one and the same. Through his camoflauge of "Journalistic" words he was really holding a bitter fanboy inside. That fanboy was exsposed after being poked and prodded to by Sony fans on the article.

So if two people have the same surname they're the same person?

Yes, the US media has a very bad biased and non-consistent track record (same goes for many other types of news coverages, political, economic, etc - sometimes they seem to aim for self-fullfilling prohecies regarding stock trends and such). IMO other media are in general more balanced and objective. IGN is IMO overall pretty reliable though, relatively speaking.

If you're a FPS fan, check out Killzone 2, it may result into more balanced views for PS3/Sony/whatever haters as well.

Why I can see where your predictions derive from, your logic is flawed. Just because there has not been one does not mean there wont be one. If no games have released for a system yet does that mean that no game will ever sell over a million? NO! It just means it has not happened so far. No one just knew that Halo was going to sell 8+ million, but they knew it would be big. Same with CoD and Gears.

Killzone 2 has the content: its being said by all who have played it that it is actually better then COD,Gears,Halo combined! Beta testers of the game are in love with the game.

Its got the hype: Where Halo had massive tons of advertising in virtually every publication, Killzone has massive internet hype. While that does not have the range of TV and billboards, it does get the hardcore in the know how about it. Killzone 2's marketing campaign has yet to be seen and could be great.

To go the route of your thought process says that really great games that are better then the competition don't sell well because of the particular platform they are on instead of selling of their own merit. That is a concept I do not condone nor take part in.

wow, this guy got attacked big time reading from the comments.