By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Nintendo: "We aren't competing with Sony or Microsoft"

sethnintendo said:
Seriously BTFeather56 get over it. Who cares if you don't like the Wii or it's games. Everything you say is complete b.s.

 

 http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=2817

     So, you don't think that the page that the link above takes  you to says there was only a 15,000 difference between the Wii and PS3 and that was the smallest margin between any of the consoles?

 

 



Heavens to Murgatoids.

Around the Network
BTFeather55 said:
Shanobi said:
BTFeather55 said:

Wii numbers are much lower than I would expect for the console in Japan. Sure following the DQX announcement it went over the 100,000 plus mark for awhile as expected and It will probably be back over 100,000 a week when Monster Hunter G is released with its new classic controller, etc. However, in a normal week, last week, according to the new numbers put up in the Famitsu thread here today, we see the Wii only beating the PS3 by 15,000 units (less than the number that the PS3 outsold the 360 by), and I think it is because the Japanese, being more discerning in their gaming palates than senior citizens in the West that buy a Wii because their local news show says Wii Fit is a good thing for them to get moderate exercise with, do know that there are some shortcomings in the Wii's software library that is keeping it from getting mega numbers. If the PS3 is getting 30,000 sales a week and the Wii is getting less than 45,000 sales a week there, then I think there is more of a competition between the two than Nintendo, Nintendo fans, and the PS3 is deadz, crowd might be willing to admit.

 

I like how you ignore what I posted to you, showing your claims of the sales as bunk, and then you try to make some snyde comments about Wii owners in the west. Last I checked, Wii was still way ahead in Japan.

 

And for what you're trying to argue, it's funny that the Wii's sales are spiking up much higher than the PS3.

 

http://vgchartz.com/hwlaunch.php?cons1=Wii®1=Japan&cons2=PS3®2=Japan&cons3=X360®3=Japan&weeks=156

 

Would'ja lookey that!

 

      I wasn't trying to argue anything.  I was stating a fact.  PS3 sales in Japan for the week of 1-3-2009 to 1-10-2009 = ~29,000.

Wii sales = 44,000 for the same week.  That is a difference of 15,000 units.  That is smaller than the same week's gaps between the PS3 and the 360 ~20,000 unit difference in favor of PS3, the DSi and the PSP 17,000 difference between the DSi and PS3 in favor of DSi, and the PSP and the Wii 25,000 difference in favor of the PSP.  And leads one to think that the competition is stiffer between the PS3 and Wii than the other consoles.

 

http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=2817

 

Cling to that if you like. The fact of the matter is, the Wii has outsold the PS3 by close to 4 times in japan.

 

http://vgchartz.com/hwcomps.php?cons1=Wii&reg1=Japan&cons2=PS3&reg2=Japan&cons3=X360&reg3=Japan&start=39460&end=39824&weekly=1

You have yet to make a point that actually lands a real punch.



 

http://www.shanepeters.com/

http://shanepeters.deviantart.com/

Achievement is its own reward, pride only obscures.

HATING OPHELIA- Coming soon from Markosia Comics!

Zucas said:
Wow just wow. I mean clearly what the topic title says isn't what was said in the article. Also he falsely quote Nintendo in the topic. Now that's lying and negligently misquoting an article right there and of course misleading topics are supposed to be taken down.

So yea why did this topic even stay up? It's misquoted, misinterpreted, misleading topic name, and really just wrong on every last thing stated and insinuated. Just full of fail as the internet would put it. On topic, got nothing to say to something so poorly presented and interpreted.

What is this bullshit?

But according to Koda, the company considers neither Microsoft nor Sony as rivals in the marketplace: "People often ask such questions, and we say our competitor is neither those companies, but consumer indifferent to games," he said.

Nintendo "We aren't competing with Sony or Microsoft"

The quotes are exactly-the-same. I'm reporting your post for trolling. Get of my thread and learn to read.



Shanobi said:
BTFeather55 said:
Shanobi said:
BTFeather55 said:

Wii numbers are much lower than I would expect for the console in Japan. Sure following the DQX announcement it went over the 100,000 plus mark for awhile as expected and It will probably be back over 100,000 a week when Monster Hunter G is released with its new classic controller, etc. However, in a normal week, last week, according to the new numbers put up in the Famitsu thread here today, we see the Wii only beating the PS3 by 15,000 units (less than the number that the PS3 outsold the 360 by), and I think it is because the Japanese, being more discerning in their gaming palates than senior citizens in the West that buy a Wii because their local news show says Wii Fit is a good thing for them to get moderate exercise with, do know that there are some shortcomings in the Wii's software library that is keeping it from getting mega numbers. If the PS3 is getting 30,000 sales a week and the Wii is getting less than 45,000 sales a week there, then I think there is more of a competition between the two than Nintendo, Nintendo fans, and the PS3 is deadz, crowd might be willing to admit.

 

I like how you ignore what I posted to you, showing your claims of the sales as bunk, and then you try to make some snyde comments about Wii owners in the west. Last I checked, Wii was still way ahead in Japan.

 

And for what you're trying to argue, it's funny that the Wii's sales are spiking up much higher than the PS3.

 

http://vgchartz.com/hwlaunch.php?cons1=Wii®1=Japan&cons2=PS3®2=Japan&cons3=X360®3=Japan&weeks=156

 

Would'ja lookey that!

 

      I wasn't trying to argue anything.  I was stating a fact.  PS3 sales in Japan for the week of 1-3-2009 to 1-10-2009 = ~29,000.

Wii sales = 44,000 for the same week.  That is a difference of 15,000 units.  That is smaller than the same week's gaps between the PS3 and the 360 ~20,000 unit difference in favor of PS3, the DSi and the PSP 17,000 difference between the DSi and PS3 in favor of DSi, and the PSP and the Wii 25,000 difference in favor of the PSP.  And leads one to think that the competition is stiffer between the PS3 and Wii than the other consoles.

 

http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=2817

 

Cling to that if you like. The fact of the matter is, the Wii has outsold the PS3 by close to 4 times in japan.

 

http://vgchartz.com/hwcomps.php?cons1=Wii®1=Japan&cons2=PS3®2=Japan&cons3=X360®3=Japan&start=39460&end=39824&weekly=1

You have yet to make a point that actually lands a real punch.

 

       Like anyone else other than the prof has.  The race between the Wii and PS3 is pretty much starting to head the way that the race between the DS and PSP started to go last year in Japan.



Heavens to Murgatoids.

@BTFeather, I was mainly going on about how you were trying to talk about gamerankings from website and how that determines if it is a good game or not. So not everything you say is b.s. but not sure what the point is that PS3 sold less than 15,000 Wii in Japan. I guess in 100 years PS3 might catch up?



Around the Network

@BTFeather

Are you really using one weeks numbers as support?



Tag: Hawk - Reluctant Dark Messiah (provided by fkusumot)

theprof00 said:
dharh said:
theprof00 said:
donathos said:
Hey, maybe we should have Outcast explain this all to the NPD group. Once they understand that the Wii & the HD systems aren't really competing (Nintendo said so!!!), they'll stop listing the figures together.

That way, follks like the OP can stop having this monthly crisis.

actually if you look at some stock analysis professionals think that the wii is taking market share away from computer-based gaming companies. Because they really have no idea why the stocks are going down. A lot of these professionals are really just professional at the method they use and not really that well informed about the subject they are applying their background to.

For example stock for nintendo had a low of 35 and a high of 70. the 35 was right before christmas season, and now its at 45. These people do not know what the fuck the are doing, so stop focusing on what the analysts and traders are doing.
They don't know shit, gaming is such a niche subject that nobody has really stopped to pay attention to the gaming world, it is about the least understood market among economists and traders because nobody cares enough to figure it out.

Read the news, everybody is excited about video games now, and people are fuckin' surprised about it. "Gee I never thought it would do so well and be this popular." That's the sentiment shared around the globe about this industry, but that is changing. As people are realizing that they are losing out on tremendous profits, they are finally starting to give it a chance and actually study. There are many that know what they are doing, but the majority is still in the dark.

Nintendo knows what they are doing and have said it several times now. Their target is non-gamers. HD target is gamers.

It's nothing to get defensive about, thats just how it is.

Don't you think NPD should be listing Leapster too? I bet leapster has about 10m WW, why isn't that included?

 

If you take MMO's out of the picture, PC gaming has been stagnating or drifting downwards. Many of the big PC games are also found on HD consoles now. Whats left are the low budget games, mini-games, etc. Sure that part of the PC game market might drift towards the Wii, but its the HD consoles which left the hole wide enough in the first place.

This is what I love. Whenever I talk about sales with a wii supporter it's always "if you exclude this" or "if you take that out of the equation".

I once responded to some dolt who said gaming was losing popularity and market by saying that gaming has been growing tremendously every year. He said that as a way of saying that the Wii was needed to stimulate the failing market. He then said, "well if you take the wii and the ds out of the sales, then gaming is actually falling 9%". What a stupid argument. You say that it is the wii that is saving the market and then include the ds which not many people actually have a problem with. Lots of people, even hardcorez like myself, love the ds and what it does for the industry. The Wii on the other hand, just doesn't have the same advantages as the ds, in terms of games, portability, price and so on.

but I digress....

"If you take MMO's out of the picture... " First thing in my mind- "WTF"

What kind of argument is that. I have never heard a more blatant disregard of rationale in order to prove a point.

MMO is part of the industry, it is a type of game that has been around forever. If RTS' controlled the market like back in the starcraft, war craft, red alert days, then your argument would be "take away the RTS's blah blah blah". It's a synonymous statement.

Right now, that is what is popular. You take it away like it somehow makes sense, but what makes more sense is that WoW is the biggest game of all time, and has taken gamers from other genres.

 The sales are increasing, it is just that the genre dominance changes.
This, you may find hard to believe, is why other games are having a hard time, this and piracy. And yet, lo and behold, amidst all the piracy that is going on, which is also growing every year especially now in the recession, pc game sales are STILL increasing. So take that bullshit somewhere else.

I'm not even going to focus on the resst of your statement because it relies on the "fact" that PC gaming is in decline.

@bdbdbd
I read your post, and I completely agree with you. Not one bit of it is something I have ever said is untrue. However, despite your logic, which I also feel is very accurate detailed, you leave one bit out.

In the part where Nintendo is going to follow the core market upstream, you have no timeline and you guesstimate at what will happen. No doubt that nintendo is going to put out some core games, but they also did so last year. So that is just obvious. The doubt that I have is when you think they will get more core games, because looking at the trend, I see more cancellations and downgrades from everything nintendo. From stellar zelda graphics on the GC, to the cancellation of KidIc. coupled with what I feel is a real slap in the face to core gamers for the last ten months.

 

First of all.  I am not a wii supporter.  Plenty of people here can attest to that.

Second, where ever did I say that the wii is saving the market?  Never did.  I would only say that the console gaming market is grabing market share from the PC market.

Third, I was saying to take MMO's out to make a specific point.  MMO's are clearly the strength of the PC market, and I believe will continue to be so.  To the point that eventually MMO's will dwarf every other gaming aspect of PC gaming by 10s to 100s times.

That when it comes to big single player games the consoles are stealing the thunder.  If you put MMO's back into the picture then consoles are merely just larger and growing faster than PC gaming.

Sorry to burst _your_ bubble, but when it comes to gaming consoles are where its at.  Eventually all big games, MMO's included will be on console.  Then we might actually see PC gaming shrink instead of being merely slower growing.



A warrior keeps death on the mind from the moment of their first breath to the moment of their last.



I think I'll do the smart thing and remove myself from this argument. Fact is all systems have good games on them and whatever system you prefer is fine.



c0rd, your logic makes all the sense in the world and I applaus you for it but look at the big picture. Nintendo hasn't done anything coming even close to saying "thanks 3rd parties, we are happy to have you", and the only one they care about is sega.
For a company that literally prints money, you would think that maybe they would invest in some third party core titles like sony and ms do.
But no, they do the opposite. Their strategy is to do what they want and let the companies come to them. Great business strategy, yes. But to me, it's arrogant, and shows me a "fine, we don't need it" attitude.

About your list.
First of all, you can get most of their release games for ~35$ so already they are 15-20$ cheaper than a wii game. Secondly, being portable is a big plus, so even a decent DS game trumps a slightly better console game.
Let me show you the reason DS is doing so well.

stuff like this. Stuff like this has turned the DS into the cheapest computer available. You can type on it, you can learn languages, you can busy yourself, train your brain, train your body, make appointments, make friends, play wirelessly online interact with things, long battery life and lots of support.

And 90% of this costs just 30$ per ability.  These three games pictured each replace a standalone with similar function. The first is 2000 japanese characters with stroke order and drawing pad for practice, replacing 300-700$ electronic dictionaries by casio and others.

The second and third? Paper in electronic form, with hundreds of hours of use. The DS has some fucking insane value. 30$ for something you could end up using for 6 years... Tell me the wii has this because it doesn't. Note: This is also why I am more than a little upset about the DS, less support, less compatibility, less battery, less games, more money.

The DS is a success because you can see the value and opportunity. It can replace pretty much anything you can write on using a pencil. Although the DS has games, it is also a tool. The wii instead replaces the actual activity as well as the equipment ....

Plus the DS is easy to develop for and so it has much more support from independants. The wii is relatively hard to program to get the wand function down.

However, blaming the devs is not the solution, because the same kind of awesome-ness is just not there. Also, you have listed some great games, at least triple the amount of what I would call core games than exists on the wii.

 

About the us vs them. It's true. Wii supporters have some twisted logic sometimes, so does everyone but I don't get in nearly as many arguments with others. I am a future Wii supporter. We are all in the same boat, but I know when to say that something is messed up with the games situation on the wii, and I don't try to twist the circumstances to make ps3 look better.



sethnintendo said:
@BTFeather, I was mainly going on about how you were trying to talk about gamerankings from website and how that determines if it is a good game or not. So not everything you say is b.s. but not sure what the point is that PS3 sold less than 15,000 Wii in Japan. I guess in 100 years PS3 might catch up?

 

      Last year when MGS came out it beat the Wii in Japan.  When GT5 and FF come out, they will also make the PS3 beat the Wii in Japan, and that will just be the beginning of the PS3's momentum.  Kingdom Hearts is going to wind up being a crucial game for whichever console gets it because if it goes to the Wii, hey, it will win this gen imo, but if it goes to the PS3 along with some more Square games together with new games from Kojima and Yu Suzuki, then you would see the PS3 really start to gain some steam, and if all Nintendo has lined up for the core fans that are ticked off about the glut of casual games coming to the system is the next Mario and Zelda, the PS3 could either give the Wii a run for its money or become the dominant console by the time this gen is over.



Heavens to Murgatoids.